Literature DB >> 10456068

Differential patterns of c-fos mRNA expression in amygdala during successive stages of odor discrimination learning.

U S Hess1, C M Gall, R Granger, G Lynch.   

Abstract

Expression of the activity-dependent gene c-fos was used to assess relative levels of neuronal activation in the amygdala and related structures of rats at different stages of odor discrimination learning. In situ hybridization was used to evaluate c-fos mRNA content within the amygdalar subdivisions, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and the hippocampus. After initial exploration of the test apparatus, c-fos mRNA levels were increased in the medial and, to lesser extent, basolateral subdivisions and remained low in the central division. The balance of amygdala to hippocampal labeling favored hippocampus. Rats engaged in familiar nose-poke responses had comparably elevated labeling in the medial and basolateral divisions and low labeling densities in the central division. The ratio of hippocampal to amygdala labeling was at control levels. Rats required to switch from ad libitum responding to cued responding to odors had high basolateral to medial labeling ratios. This was in marked contrast to the medial dominance found in control and exploration rats. Hybridization was substantially more dense in basolateral amygdala than in hippocampal CA1; this imbalance was unique to the group required to form first associations between odors and rewards. Rats performing an overtrained odor discrimination had the least differentiation between amygdalar subdivisions of any behavioral group. The hippocampus-to-amygdala labeling ratio favored hippocampus and was nearly identical to the ratio in exploration rats. These results demonstrate that the balance of activity within the between limbic structures shifts according to behavioral demands. It is suggested that the balances reflect the availability of pertinent afferent cues, interactions between hippocampus and the extended amygdala, and relative levels of activity in the diffuse projections to the limbic system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10456068     DOI: 10.1101/lm.4.3.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  9 in total

1.  Increase in syntaxin 1B mRNA in hippocampal and cortical circuits during spatial learning reflects a mechanism of trans-synaptic plasticity involved in establishing a memory trace.

Authors:  S Davis; J Rodger; A Stéphan; A Hicks; J Mallet; S Laroche
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Mapping of olfactory memory circuits: region-specific c-fos activation after odor-reward associative learning or after its retrieval.

Authors:  Sophie Tronel; Susan J Sara
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Amygdala regulation of immediate-early gene expression in the hippocampus induced by contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Nicole C Huff; Matthew Frank; Karli Wright-Hardesty; David Sprunger; Patricia Matus-Amat; Emily Higgins; Jerry W Rudy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Differential involvement of the central amygdala in appetitive versus aversive learning.

Authors:  Ewelina Knapska; Grazyna Walasek; Evgeni Nikolaev; Frieder Neuhäusser-Wespy; Hans-Peter Lipp; Leszek Kaczmarek; Tomasz Werka
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Neurobiology of infant attachment.

Authors:  Stephanie Moriceau; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Ethanol-induced alterations of c-Fos immunoreactivity in specific limbic brain regions following ethanol discrimination training.

Authors:  Joyce Besheer; Jason P Schroeder; Rebekah A Stevenson; Clyde W Hodge
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Fos and Egr1 expression in the rat brain in response to olfactory cue after taste-potentiated odor aversion retrieval.

Authors:  David Dardou; Frédérique Datiche; Martine Cattarelli
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  Reward expectation alters learning and memory: the impact of the amygdala on appetitive-driven behaviors.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Raddy L Ramos
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Immediate Early Genes, Memory and Psychiatric Disorders: Focus on c-Fos, Egr1 and Arc.

Authors:  Francisco T Gallo; Cynthia Katche; Juan F Morici; Jorge H Medina; Noelia V Weisstaub
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.