Literature DB >> 10455830

Eating in labour. A randomised controlled trial assessing the risks and benefits.

M J Scrutton1, G A Metcalfe, C Lowy, P T Seed, G O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether permitting women in labour to eat a light diet would: (i) alter their metabolic profile, (ii) influence the outcome of labour, and (iii) increase residual gastric volume and consequent risk of pulmonary aspiration. Women were randomised to receive either a light diet (eating group, n = 48) or water only (starved group, n = 46) during labour. The light diet prevented the rise in plasma beta-hydroxybutyrate (p = 2.3 x 10(-5)) and nonesterified fatty acids (p = 9.3 x 10(-7)) seen in the starved group. Plasma glucose (p = 0.003) and insulin (p = 0.017) rose in the eating group but there was no difference in plasma lactate (p = 0.167) between the groups. There were no differences between the groups with respect to duration of first or second stage of labour, oxytocin requirements, mode of delivery, Apgar scores or umbilical artery and venous blood samples. Relative gastric volumes estimated by ultrasound measurement of gastric antral cross-sectional area were larger (p = 0.001) in the eating group. This was supported by the observation that those from this group who vomited, vomited significantly larger volumes than those in the starved group (p = 0.001). We conclude that eating in labour prevents the development of ketosis but significantly increases residual gastric volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10455830     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  10 in total

1.  Eat, drink, and be labouring?

Authors:  Jennifer A Beggs; M Colleen Stainton
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2002

2.  Care practice #4: no routine interventions.

Authors:  Judith A Lothian; Debby Amis; Jeannette Crenshaw
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

Review 3.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour.

Authors:  Mandisa Singata; Joan Tranmer; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 5.  Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour.

Authors:  Mandisa Singata; Joan Tranmer; Gillian M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-22

6.  Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  M C Mushambi; S M Kinsella; M Popat; H Swales; K K Ramaswamy; A L Winton; A C Quinn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Oren Gal; Mark Rotshtein; Dan Feldman; Amir Mari; Motti Hallak; Yael Kopelman
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-14

8.  Effect of food intake during labour on obstetric outcome: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Geraldine O'Sullivan; Bing Liu; Darren Hart; Paul Seed; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-24

9.  Effect of oral carbohydrate intake on labor progress: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R Rahmani; Z Khakbazan; P Yavari; M Granmayeh; L Yavari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Investigation on the status of oral intake management measures during labor in China.

Authors:  Chuan-Ya Huang; Bi-Ru Luo; Juan Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.