Literature DB >> 10454707

A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades.

K S Khan1, C R Nwosu, S F Khan, L S Dwarakanath, P F Chien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to assess authorship trends over time by taking account of publication type and controlling for number of investigating centers and funding status in a multivariable analysis. STUDY
DESIGN: A database of 403 randomized studies and 193 controlled observational studies was assembled by means of a combination of electronic and hand search of 4 generic obstetrics and gynecology journals for the years 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, and 1995. A multivariable logistic regression model was built for evaluating the effect of time on authorship with multiauthored articles as the binary outcome variable (articles were classified as either those with <6 authors or those with >/=6). The analysis was performed separately for the 2 types of publications, and it was adjusted for the confounding effects of number of centers, funding status, and journal of publication. The beta coefficient (and its exponent) associated with the time term in the logistic model provided a measure of the trend in publication of multiauthored articles.
RESULTS: In randomized studies the odds of publishing a multiauthored article, given the number of centers, funding status, and journal, were increased on average by 6% with every 5-year increment in time (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1. 10; P =.007). Similarly, in controlled observational studies, there was a 10% increase in the odds of publishing multiauthored articles (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.20; P =.03).
CONCLUSION: There is an inflationary trend in authorship that is not explained solely by the increased collaboration between centers and funding for research.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10454707     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70585-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.

Authors:  Matko Marusić; Jadranka Bozikov; Vedran Katavić; Darko Hren; Marko Kljaković-Gaspić; Ana Marusić
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Publish together or perish: the increasing number of authors per article in academic journals is the consequence of a changing scientific culture. Some researchers define authorship quite loosely.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Methodology and analytic techniques used in clinical research: associations with journal impact factor.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Effects of research complexity and competition on the incidence and growth of coauthorship in biomedicine.

Authors:  Jason Cory Brunson; Xiaoyan Wang; Reinhard C Laubenbacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Survey of trends in authorship assignment in gynecologic oncology: Keeping score and playing fair.

Authors:  Laura M Chambers; Catherine H Watson; Meng Yao; Kimberly Levinson; Ronald D Alvarez; Ramez N Eskander; Megan Buechel; Chad M Michener; Amelia Jernigan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Authorship growth in contemporary medical literature.

Authors:  Julie Y An; Rachel J Marchalik; Rachael L Sherrer; Joseph A Baiocco; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.