Literature DB >> 10454451

Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

A Jula1, P Puukka, H Karanko.   

Abstract

To compare multiple clinic and home blood pressure (BP) measurements and ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of hypertension, we studied 239 middle-aged pharmacologically untreated hypertensive men and women who were referred to the study from the primary healthcare provider. Ambulatory BP monitoring was successfully completed for 233 patients. Clinic BP was measured by a trained nurse with a mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged over 4 duplicate measures. Self-recorded home BP was measured with a semiautomatic oscillometric device twice every morning and twice every evening on 7 consecutive days. Ambulatory BP was recorded with an auscultatory device. Two-dimensionally controlled M-mode echocardiography was successfully performed on 232 patients. Twenty-four-hour urinary albumin was determined by nephelometry. Clinic BP was 144.5+/-12.6/94.5+/-7.4 mm Hg, home BP (the mean of 14 self-recorded measures) was 138.9+/-13.1/92.9+/-8.6 mm Hg, home morning BP (the mean of the first 4 duplicate morning measures) was 137.1+/-13.7/92.4+/-9.2 mm Hg, daytime ambulatory BP was 148.3+/-13. 9/91.9+/-7.8 mm Hg, nighttime ambulatory BP was 125.5+/-16.4/75. 6+/-8.9 mm Hg, and 24-hour ambulatory BP was 141.7+/-14.0/87.2+/-7.6 mm Hg. Pearson correlation coefficients of clinic, home, home morning, and daytime ambulatory BPs to albuminuria and to the characteristics of the left ventricle were nearly equal. In multivariate regression analyses, 36% (P<0.0001) of the cross-sectional variation in left ventricular mass index was attributed to gender and home morning systolic BP in models that originally included age, gender, and clinic, self-measured home morning, and ambulatory daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs. We concluded that carefully controlled nonphysician-measured clinic and self-measured home BPs, when averaged over 4 duplicate measurements, are as reliable as ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of untreated hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10454451     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.2.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  20 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based treatment of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure: an evidence based review.

Authors:  F A McAlister; S E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-14

Review 2.  Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Jacob George; Thomas MacDonald
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

3.  A novel approach to office blood pressure measurement: 30-minute office blood pressure vs daytime ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Mark C van der Wel; Iris E Buunk; Chris van Weel; Theo A B M Thien; J Carel Bakx
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Prevalence and reproducibility of differences between home and ambulatory blood pressure and their relation with hypertensive organ damage.

Authors:  K Gazzola; M Cammenga; N V van der Hoeven; G A van Montfrans; B J H van den Born
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Relative utility of home, ambulatory, and office blood pressures in the prediction of end-organ damage.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Thomas G Pickering; Tanya M Spruill; Dennis Abraham; Joseph E Schwartz; William Gerin
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  The misdiagnosis of hypertension: the role of patient anxiety.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Thomas G Pickering; Lynn Clemow; William Chaplin; Tanya M Spruill; Gabrielle M Albanese; Kazuo Eguchi; Matthew Burg; William Gerin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-08

8.  Reliability of morning, before-dinner, and at-bedtime home blood pressure measurements in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujiwara; Satoshi Hoshide; Hiroshi Kanegae; Masafumi Nishizawa; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  The importance of accurate blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

10.  Reproducibility of wrist home blood pressure measurement with position sensor and automatic data storage.

Authors:  Sakir Uen; Rolf Fimmers; Miriam Brieger; Georg Nickenig; Thomas Mengden
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.