Literature DB >> 10453666

Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 or more years.

R A Levine1, D S Clem, T G Wilson, F Higginbottom, G Solnit.   

Abstract

This report involves the retrospective evaluation of ITI implants placed by a group of 12 clinicians located throughout the United States. Of the original 174 single implants placed in 129 patients reported previously, 157 were examined in 110 patients after 2 or more years (average 40.1 months). Twenty-two implants remained in the anterior and 135 implants (86%) remained in the posterior areas of the mouth, with 81 being restored with an octabutment screw-retained crown and 76 restored with a conical-abutment cemented crown (in function 2 years or longer). Occlusal screw loosening was observed in 22.2% of implants over both periods, with only 1 tooth loosening in both study periods (6 months to 2 years and > or = 2 years). Loosening of a solid conical abutment occurred in 1 additional patient, for cumulative conical abutment loosening of 5.3%. Significant radiographic bone loss was observed around 4 implants, with implant fracture noted with 3 additional implants (all mandibular first molars with hollow-screw or hollow-cylinder implant design). The survival rate at > or = 2 years was 95.5%. The data suggest that ITI implants can be a satisfactory choice for posterior single-tooth restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10453666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  Stresses induced by one piece and two piece dental implants in All-on-4® implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: non linear finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostafa Abdelfattah Mohamed; Mohamed Gamal Askar; Mahmoud El-Moutassim Bellah El Homossany
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability.

Authors:  Hyon-Mo Shin; Jung-Bo Huh; Mi-Jeong Yun; Young-Chan Jeon; Brian Myung Chang; Chang-Mo Jeong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 4.  Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jatin K Jain; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sameer Chauhan; Piyush Javiya; Shreya Srivastava; Rutvik Patel; Bhagyashri Bhalani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Comparative effect of implant-abutment connections, abutment angulations, and screw lengths on preloaded abutment screw using three-dimensional finite element analysis: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Krishna Chaitanya Kanneganti; Dileep Nag Vinnakota; Srinivas Rao Pottem; Mahesh Pulagam
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Comparison of the removal torque and a histomorphometric evaluation of the RBM treated implants with the RBM followed by laser treated implants: an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Eun Young Park; Hae Ok Sohn; Eun-Kyong Kim
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2019-01-11

7.  Retrospective Clinical Study of a Freely Removable Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis by a Microlocking System.

Authors:  Eun-Bin Bae; Won-Tak Cho; Hyun-Young Bae; So-Hyoun Lee; Tae-Hyung Kim; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.