Literature DB >> 10453384

The DICOM review stations: are they truly different?

B Goedhart1, G J Brand, J H Reiber.   

Abstract

Digital acquisition systems are widely used nowadays. The digitization of the cath lab environment is now directed towards the change in the exchange media from an analog (i.e. cinefilm) to a digital (i.e. CD-R) medium. An important consequence of this development is the need for another type of review system. This article focuses on the replacement of the cineprojector by a digital equivalent: the DICOM review station. Since the technologies differ fundamentally, the DICOM review station has very little in common with its analog predecessor. This article explains the basics of DICOM review stations. Different approaches, both in hardware and in software, are possible, each showing their advantages and drawbacks. The impact of choices made by the industry will be illustrated by a number of commercially available DICOM review stations. Further, the article discusses the topics of diagnostic image quality and performance. In our opinion, these are the major topics when it comes to an objective comparison of the capabilities of DICOM review stations. The relation of these subjects with design choices in terms of hardware and software are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10453384     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006025826795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  4 in total

1.  The DICOM standard. A breakthrough for digital information exchange in cardiology.

Authors:  C Parisot
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995

2.  The influence of image enhancement and reconstruction on quantitative coronary arteriography.

Authors:  P M van der Zwet; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-12

3.  American College of Cardiology, American College of Radiology and industry develop standard for digital transfer of angiographic images. ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  IPI, MEDICOM and DICOM: relations and possible future.

Authors:  K W Bjerde
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.