Literature DB >> 10452336

Melatonin rhythm observed throughout a three-cycle bright-light stimulus designed to reset the human circadian pacemaker.

T L Shanahan1, R E Kronauer, J F Duffy, G H Williams, C A Czeisler.   

Abstract

Exposure to light and darkness can rapidly induce phase shifts of the human circadian pacemaker. A type 0 phase response curve (PRC) to light that has been reported for humans was based on circadian phase data collected from constant routines performed before and after a three-cycle light stimulus, but resetting data observed throughout the entire resetting protocol have not been previously reported. Pineal melatonin secretion is governed by the hypothalamic circadian pacemaker via a well-defined neural pathway and is reportedly less subject to the masking effects of sleep and activity than body temperature. The authors reasoned that observation of the melatonin rhythm throughout the three-cycle light resetting trials could provide daily phase-resetting information, allowing a dynamic view of the resetting response of the circadian pacemaker to light. Subjects (n = 12) living in otherwise dim light (approximately 10-15 lux) were exposed to a noncritical stimulus of three cycles of bright light (approximately 9500 lux for 5 h per day) timed to phase advance or phase delay the human circadian pacemaker; control subjects (n = 11) were scheduled to the same protocols but exposed to three 5-h darkness cycles instead of light. Subjects underwent initial and final constant routine phase assessments; hourly melatonin samples and body temperature data were collected throughout the protocol. Average daily phase shifts of 1 to 3 h were observed in 11 of 12 subjects receiving the bright light, supporting predictions obtained using Kronauer's phase-amplitude model of the resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker. The melatonin rhythm in the 12th subject progressively attenuated in amplitude throughout the resetting trial, becoming undetectable for >32 hours preceding an abrupt reappearance of the rhythm at a shifted phase with a recovered amplitude. The data from control subjects who remained in dim lighting and darkness delayed on average -0.2 h per day, consistent with the daily delay expected due to the longer than 24-h intrinsic period of the human circadian pacemaker. Both temperature and melatonin rhythms shifted by equivalent amounts in both bright light-treated and control subjects (R = 0.968; p<0.0001; n = 23). Observation of the melatonin rhythm throughout a three-cycle resetting trial has provided a dynamic view of the daily phase-resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker. Taken together with the observation of strong type 0 resetting in humans in response to the same three-cycle stimulus applied at a critical phase, these data confirm the importance of considering both phase and amplitude when describing the resetting of the human circadian pacemaker by light.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Regulatory Physiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452336     DOI: 10.1177/074873099129000560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  22 in total

1.  A phase response curve to single bright light pulses in human subjects.

Authors:  Sat Bir S Khalsa; Megan E Jewett; Christian Cajochen; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  No time to lose: workshop on circadian rhythms and metabolic disease.

Authors:  Corinne M Silva; Sheryl Sato; Ronald N Margolis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The Gordon Wilson Lecture: work hours, sleep and patient safety in residency training.

Authors:  Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Skin, reactive oxygen species, and circadian clocks.

Authors:  Mary A Ndiaye; Minakshi Nihal; Gary S Wood; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.401

5.  The Case for Addressing Operator Fatigue.

Authors:  Jeanne F Duffy; Kirsi-Marja Zitting; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2015-06

6.  Improved neurobehavioral performance during the wake maintenance zone.

Authors:  Julia A Shekleton; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Joshua J Gooley; Eliza Van Reen; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Comparison of amplitude recovery dynamics of two limit cycle oscillator models of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Premananda Indic; Daniel B Forger; Melissa A St Hilaire; Dennis A Dean; Emery N Brown; Richard E Kronauer; Elizabeth B Klerman; Megan E Jewett
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Short nights attenuate light-induced circadian phase advances in humans.

Authors:  Helen J Burgess; Charmane I Eastman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Shift Work and Shift Work Sleep Disorder: Clinical and Organizational Perspectives.

Authors:  Emerson M Wickwire; Jeanne Geiger-Brown; Steven M Scharf; Christopher L Drake
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Scheduled bright light for treatment of insomnia in older adults.

Authors:  Leah Friedman; Jamie M Zeitzer; Clete Kushida; Irina Zhdanova; Art Noda; Tina Lee; Bret Schneider; Christian Guilleminault; Javaid Sheikh; Jerome A Yesavage
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.