Literature DB >> 10451519

Prenatal tests: how are women deciding?

S Michie1, D Smith, T M Marteau.   

Abstract

Women offered prenatal tests should be given sufficient information to enable them to make an informed decision. We compared the decision-making of 261 women who underwent serum screening for Down syndrome with 63 who did not. A questionnaire completed at 16 weeks' gestation assessed systematic decision-making (the weighing up of pros and cons on the basis of information presented), knowledge, anxiety and demographic information. Those undergoing screening were older but, with age partialled out, they had more knowledge about the test and made decisions less systematically than those not screened. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10451519     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199908)19:8<743::aid-pd636>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

Authors:  Cath Jackson; Francine M Cheater; Innes Reid
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Ambivalence toward undergoing invasive prenatal testing: an exploration of its origins.

Authors:  Julie Chevalier Sapp; Sara Chandros Hull; Shelby Duffer; Sarah Zornetzer; Erica Sutton; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Adjunct prenatal testing: patient decisions regarding ethnic carrier screening and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Erica L Sturm; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Patricia K Agatisa; Benjamin Nutter
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.689

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.