Literature DB >> 10451401

The strengths and limitations of parental heights as a predictor of attained height.

C M Wright1, T D Cheetham.   

Abstract

Mid-parental heights are widely used to help assess an individual child's growth. However, the methods in use vary, and most make no allowance for extremes of parental height. This study aimed to examine the actual distribution of parental heights in a survey population and the relation with their children's heights. The heights of 419 representatively sampled children aged 8-9 years were compared with their reported mid-parental heights, all expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS). These confirmed previous predictions that 90% of the children's heights would fall within 1.5 SDS (approximately two centile spaces) of their mid-parental heights. However, where parents were unusually tall or short, their children were relatively less tall or short, respectively, and the mid-parental height was a poor predictor of attained height. A simple calculator for expected height centile is described that automatically adjusts for this regression to the mean. Of 13 children below the second centile for height, eight were within two centile spaces (90% range) of their mid-parental height SDS. However, when allowance was made for regression to the mean, only three of 13 were within the 90% range. Although mid-parental height provides a useful guide to expected height centile for children and parents of average stature, it can be misleading when used to assess short children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10451401      PMCID: PMC1718044          DOI: 10.1136/adc.81.3.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  10 in total

1.  Desire for the body normal: body image and discrepancies between self reported and measured height and weight in a British population.

Authors:  S Ziebland; M Thorogood; A Fuller; J Muir
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Sex differences in weight in infancy. Published centile charts for weights have been updated.

Authors:  M A Preece; J V Freeman; T J Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-07

3.  Standards for children's height at ages 2-9 years allowing for heights of parents.

Authors:  J M Tanner; H Goldstein; R H Whitehouse
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Growth patterns in child abuse.

Authors:  L S Taitz; J M King
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1988

5.  Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990.

Authors:  J V Freeman; T J Cole; S Chinn; P R Jones; E M White; M A Preece
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Regression to the mean.

Authors:  M J Healy; H Goldstein
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  Short stature at school entry--an index of social deprivation? (The Wessex Growth Study).

Authors:  L D Voss; J Mulligan; P R Betts
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.508

8.  What is a normal rate of weight gain in infancy?

Authors:  C M Wright; J N Matthews; A Waterston; A Aynsley-Green
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Poor growth in school entrants as an index of organic disease: the Wessex growth study.

Authors:  L D Voss; J Mulligan; P R Betts; T J Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-05

10.  The normal short child. Community study of children in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Authors:  K A Lacey; J M Parkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.791

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Growth monitoring.

Authors:  D M Hall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Relation of insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 levels to growth retardation in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction.

Authors:  Lalit Nihal; Mukta R Bapat; Pravin Rathi; Nalini S Shah; Anjana Karvat; Philip Abraham; Shobna J Bhatia
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  A simple chart to identify non-familial short stature.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Growth reference charts for use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C M Wright; I W Booth; J M H Buckler; N Cameron; T J Cole; M J R Healy; J A Hulse; M A Preece; J J Reilly; A F Williams
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Accuracy of self-reported height measurements in parents and its effect on mid-parental target height calculation.

Authors:  Ieva Braziuniene; Thomas A Wilson; Andrew H Lane
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  Measured parental height in Turner syndrome-a valuable but underused diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Yasmine Ouarezki; Filiz Mine Cizmecioglu; Chourouk Mansour; Jeremy Huw Jones; Emma Jane Gault; Avril Mason; Malcolm D C Donaldson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Polygenic Scores and Parental Predictors: An Adult Height Study Based on the United Kingdom Biobank and the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Chong You; Zhenwei Zhou; Jia Wen; Yun Li; Cheng Heng Pang; Haoyang Du; Ziwen Wang; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Daniel A King; Ching-Ti Liu; Jie Huang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 8.  Early recognition of growth abnormalities permitting early intervention.

Authors:  Morey Haymond; Anne-Marie Kappelgaard; Paul Czernichow; Beverly M K Biller; Koji Takano; Wieland Kiess
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Diagnostic Work-up and Follow-up in Children with Tall Stature: A Simplified Algorithm for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Susanne E Stalman; Anke Pons; Jan M Wit; Gerdine A Kamp; Frans B Plötz
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12

10.  Fit to WHO weight standard of European infants over time.

Authors:  Daniel Levin; Louise Marryat; Tim J Cole; John McColl; Ulla Harjunmaa; Per Ashorn; Charlotte Wright
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.