Literature DB >> 10451264

An ecological risk assessment for the use of Irgarol 1051 as an algaecide for antifoulant paints.

L W Hall1, J M Giddings, K R Solomon, R Balcomb.   

Abstract

Irgarol 1051 is an algaecide used in copper-based antifoulant paints for controlling fouling organisms on the hulls of recreational and commercial watercraft. Paints containing this algaecide have been used in Europe since the mid-1980s. In 1998, the first antifouling paints containing Irgarol 1051 were registered for use in the U. S. To examine the risk that Irgarol may pose to aquatic ecosystems, a probabilistic ecological risk assessment was conducted using distributions of exposure and toxicity data. Exposure data for this assessment were derived from 11 monitoring studies (146 stations) conducted in marinas, estuaries, and coastal waters from 1992 to 1997 in six European countries. A comparison of 90th percentile concentrations pooled by station types across all regions showed that concentrations in marinas (316 ng/l) were higher than in estuaries and coastal waters (41 and 19 ng/l, respectively). A 90th percentile of 133 ng/l was reported for all pooled stations. Temporal trends showed that Irgarol concentrations typically peaked in early summer after launching of small boats with much lower concentrations occurring during the spring, fall, and winter. Toxicity data used for this risk assessment were derived primarily from unpublished studies submitted to regulatory agencies. Because Irgarol is a photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicide, it is much more toxic to plants than animals. Toxicity values for animals (fish and invertebrates) were much greater than concentrations of Irgarol reported in the environment. Therefore, a conservative approach using a distribution of only plant toxicity data (EC50s for plant growth) was used to derive a 10th percentile of 136 ng/l. This plant toxicity benchmark of 136 ng/l was used for risk characterization. Results from probabilistic analysis showed that ecological risk from Irgarol exposure was low in estuaries, coastal areas, and various open-type marinas. However, 10% or more of the plant species in enclosed marinas with low flushing rates may be exposed to Irgarol concentrations that would reduce photosynthesis activity and growth during the summer. Ecological risk to these sensitive plant species in enclosed marinas will likely be moderated because of the reversibility of Irgarol's inhibition of photosynthesis and the rapid recovery potential of plant communities. The ecological significance of marinas that generally contain numerous stressors such as trace metals, tributyltin, petroleum hydrocarbons, high nutrient concentrations, and low dissolved oxygen concentrations is a management issue that needs to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10451264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  12 in total

1.  Analysis of diazinon monitoring data from the Sacramento and Feather River watersheds: 1991-2001.

Authors:  Lenwood W Hall
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Analysis of historical salinity and boron surface water monitoring data from the San Joaquin River watershed: 1985-2002.

Authors:  W Hall Lenwood; William D Killen; Ronald D Anderson; Elgin Perry
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications.

Authors:  Punyasloke Bhadury; Phillip C Wright
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Concentrations of Irgarol in selected marinas of Oahu, Hawaii and effects on settlement of coral larval.

Authors:  Sean Knutson; Craig A Downs; Robert H Richmond
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Risk assessment of herbicides and booster biocides along estuarine continuums in the Bay of Vilaine area (Brittany, France).

Authors:  Th Caquet; M Roucaute; N Mazzella; F Delmas; C Madigou; E Farcy; Th Burgeot; J-P Allenou; R Gabellec
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Risk assessment of selected priority pollutants coming from boating activities.

Authors:  Giuliana Ansanelli; Luisa Parrella; Giuseppe Di Landa; Paolo Massanisso; Simona Schiavo; Sonia Manzo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment.

Authors:  M K Sears; R L Hellmich; D E Stanley-Horn; K S Oberhauser; J M Pleasants; H R Mattila; B D Siegfried; G P Dively
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparative toxicity of antifouling compounds on the development of sea urchin.

Authors:  Fernando Cesar Perina; Denis Moledo de Souza Abessa; Grasiela Lopes Leães Pinho; Gilberto Fillmann
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Potent Antifouling Marine Dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one-Containing Alkaloids from the Gorgonian Coral-Derived Fungus Scopulariopsis sp.

Authors:  Chang-Lun Shao; Ru-Fang Xu; Chang-Yun Wang; Pei-Yuan Qian; Kai-Ling Wang; Mei-Yan Wei
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Community-level analysis of psbA gene sequences and irgarol tolerance in marine periphyton.

Authors:  K M Eriksson; A K Clarke; L-G Franzen; M Kuylenstierna; K Martinez; H Blanck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.