Literature DB >> 10450841

The assessment of postmortem brain volume; a comparison of stereological and planimetric methodologies.

D Cotter1, K Miszkiel, S Al-Sarraj, I D Wilkinson, M Paley, M J Harrison, M A Hall-Craggs, I P Everall.   

Abstract

We compared two methods of estimating the volume of 10 formalin-fixed brains using MRI. MRI was performed and total brain volume was then assessed using two distinct techniques: a stereological point-counting technique based on the Cavalieri principle, and an edge-tracing technique. The total brain volumes obtained using these two techniques were similar and correlated closely with each other (r = 0.97). Both methods could be optimised to a similar degree while maintaining the coefficient of error at an acceptably low level. However, the stereological assessment of brain volume required between 20 min and 30 min per brain, depending on the number of points per sampling grid, compared with 1 h per brain using the planimetric method. Thus, while planimetric and stereological approaches yield very similar results, the stereological method has the advantage of greater speed and, therefore, efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450841     DOI: 10.1007/s002340050789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Choice of cross size in stereology--a cautionary note.

Authors:  J M Dickson; H M Weavers; N Mitchell; E M Winter; I D Wilkinson; E J R VanBeek; P D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Estimation of the brain stem volume by stereological method on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hulya Erbagci; Munevver Keser; Selim Kervancioglu; Nese Kizilkan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Mapping the dynamics of brain perfusion using functional ultrasound in a rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Authors:  Clément Brunner; Clothilde Isabel; Abraham Martin; Clara Dussaux; Anne Savoye; Julius Emmrich; Gabriel Montaldo; Jean-Louis Mas; Jean-Claude Baron; Alan Urban
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Efficient quantitative morphological phenotyping of genetically altered organisms using stereology.

Authors:  John Milton Lucocq
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Volumetric evaluation of the relations among the cerebrum, cerebellum and brain stem in young subjects: a combination of stereology and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nihat Ekinci; Niyazi Acer; Akcan Akkaya; Seref Sankur; Taner Kabadayi; Bünyamin Sahin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Atrophy: When too much atrophy is too little brain.

Authors:  Charles A J Romanowski; Iain D Wilkinson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Efficient stereological approaches for the volumetry of a normal or enlarged spleen from MDCT images.

Authors:  Michalis Mazonakis; John Stratakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Stereological estimation of left-ventricular volumetric and functional parameters from multidetector-row computed tomography data.

Authors:  Michalis Mazonakis; Konstantin Pagonidis; Thomas Schlosser; Peter Hunold; John Damilakis; Jörg Barkhausen; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 7.034

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.