OBJECTIVE: Sleep deprivation has been shown to have an antidepressant benefit in a subgroup of depressed patients. Functional imaging studies by the authors and others have suggested that patients with elevated metabolic rates in the anterior cingulate gyrus at baseline are more likely to respond to either sleep deprivation or antidepressant medications than patients with normal metabolic rates. The authors extend their earlier work in a larger group of patients and explore additional brain areas with statistical probability mapping. METHOD: Thirty-six patients with unipolar depression and 26 normal volunteers were studied with positron emission tomography before and after sleep deprivation. Response to sleep deprivation was defined as a 40% or larger decrease in total scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: One-third of the depressed patients had a significant response to sleep deprivation. Responders had higher relative metabolic rates in the medial prefrontal cortex, ventral anterior cingulate, and posterior subcallosal gyrus at baseline than depressed patients who did not respond to sleep deprivation and normal volunteers. Lower Hamilton depression scores correlated significantly with lower metabolic rates in the left medial prefrontal cortex. After sleep deprivation, significant decreases in metabolic rates occurred in the medial prefrontal cortex and frontal pole in the patients who responded positively to sleep deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: High pretreatment metabolic rates and decreases in metabolic rates after treatment in the medial prefrontal cortex may characterize a subgroup of depressed patients who improve following sleep deprivation and, perhaps, other antidepressant treatments.
OBJECTIVE:Sleep deprivation has been shown to have an antidepressant benefit in a subgroup of depressedpatients. Functional imaging studies by the authors and others have suggested that patients with elevated metabolic rates in the anterior cingulate gyrus at baseline are more likely to respond to either sleep deprivation or antidepressant medications than patients with normal metabolic rates. The authors extend their earlier work in a larger group of patients and explore additional brain areas with statistical probability mapping. METHOD: Thirty-six patients with unipolar depression and 26 normal volunteers were studied with positron emission tomography before and after sleep deprivation. Response to sleep deprivation was defined as a 40% or larger decrease in total scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: One-third of the depressedpatients had a significant response to sleep deprivation. Responders had higher relative metabolic rates in the medial prefrontal cortex, ventral anterior cingulate, and posterior subcallosal gyrus at baseline than depressedpatients who did not respond to sleep deprivation and normal volunteers. Lower Hamilton depression scores correlated significantly with lower metabolic rates in the left medial prefrontal cortex. After sleep deprivation, significant decreases in metabolic rates occurred in the medial prefrontal cortex and frontal pole in the patients who responded positively to sleep deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: High pretreatment metabolic rates and decreases in metabolic rates after treatment in the medial prefrontal cortex may characterize a subgroup of depressedpatients who improve following sleep deprivation and, perhaps, other antidepressant treatments.
Authors: Anita J Bechtholt-Gompf; Hali V Walther; Martha A Adams; William A Carlezon; Dost Ongür; Bruce M Cohen Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Camellia P Clark; Gregory G Brown; Sarah L Archibald; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Deborah R Braun; Linda S Thomas; Ashley N Sutherland; J Christian Gillin Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Oliver G Bosch; Julia S Rihm; Milan Scheidegger; Hans-Peter Landolt; Philipp Stämpfli; Janis Brakowski; Fabrizio Esposito; Björn Rasch; Erich Seifritz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Callie L McGrath; Mary E Kelley; Boadie W Dunlop; Paul E Holtzheimer; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jakub Z Konarski; Sidney H Kennedy; Zindel V Segal; Mark A Lau; Peter J Bieling; Roger S McIntyre; Helen S Mayberg Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Matthew S Milak; Ramin V Parsey; Leilani Lee; Maria A Oquendo; Doreen M Olvet; Francoise Eipper; Kevin Malone; J John Mann Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 3.222