Literature DB >> 10450121

Home blood pressure measurement: reproducibility and relationship with left ventricular mass.

R H Kok1, F W Beltman, W F Terpstra, A J Smit, J F May, P A de Graeff, B Meyboom-de Jong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility and relationship with left ventricular mass index of home blood pressure in comparison with ambulatory and office blood pressures.
METHODS: We measured home, ambulatory and office blood pressures of 84 previously untreated hypertensive patients, aged 60-74 years, from primary care, at baseline and after 12 weeks, without active intervention in between. Left ventricular mass index was determined echocardiographically during week 12.
RESULTS: Decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were found after 12 weeks for mean home and office blood pressures (P<0.05), but not for mean ambulatory blood pressure. The coefficients of reproducibility for systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressures were 26.4 and 16.0, respectively. Correlation coefficients for correlation of left ventricular mass index to ambulatory blood pressure (0.51 and 0.36) were higher than the correlation coefficients for home (0.31 and 0. 16) and office (0.32 and 0.21) blood pressures, for systolic and diastolic values, respectively. However, we could find no statistically significant difference among the correlation coefficients for all three types of measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Home blood pressure was considerably less reproducible than ambulatory blood pressure and no different from office blood pressure in this respect. The relationship with left ventricular mass index appeared to be stronger for ambulatory than it was for home and office blood pressures, although not statistically significant so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  4 in total

1.  Relative utility of home, ambulatory, and office blood pressures in the prediction of end-organ damage.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Thomas G Pickering; Tanya M Spruill; Dennis Abraham; Joseph E Schwartz; William Gerin
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Morning hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Reproducibility of wrist home blood pressure measurement with position sensor and automatic data storage.

Authors:  Sakir Uen; Rolf Fimmers; Miriam Brieger; Georg Nickenig; Thomas Mengden
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.