Literature DB >> 10450120

The effect of crossing legs on blood pressure: a randomized single-blind cross-over study.

G L Peters1, S K Binder, N R Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is a theoretical basis for crossing legs to increase blood pressure, there are no published data addressing this question. As a result guidelines for measurement of blood pressure are not consistent in recommending that patients legs should not be crossed during measurement.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of crossing legs on blood pressure.
METHODS: Fifty healthy volunteers and 53 patients with hypertension were randomly allocated in a study with a cross-over design to having seated blood pressure measured with their legs in three different positions: feet flat on the floor and legs crossed using two common methods. The blood pressures were assessed by an investigator who was blinded to the leg positions and used a fully automated sphygmomanometer.
RESULTS: Crossing legs during blood pressure measurement increased systolic (by average 8.1 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 5.1-11.1 mmHg for method 1; 10.5 mmHg, 6.5-14.6 mmHg for method 2) and diastolic (by 4.5 mmHg, 1.5-7.5 mmHg for method 1; 4.0 mmHg, 2.0-6.0 mmHg for method 2) blood pressures in patients who have hypertension. Crossing legs increased systolic blood pressure (by 2.5 mmHg, 1.3)3.8 mmHg for method 1; 2.3 mmHg, 0.9-3.7 mmHg for method 2) in the healthy volunteers but had little effect on diastolic blood pressure. The cardiovascular-risk class increased for a large number of the hypertensive patients but for fewer of the normotensive subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure increases when legs are crossed and this increases the estimation of cardiovascular risk for many patients. Care should be taken to ensure that the patients feet are flat on the floor when measuring their blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of manual blood pressure and heart rate measurement skills of pharmacy students: a follow-up investigation.

Authors:  Katherine E Elliott; Kenneth L McCall; David S Fike; Jill Polk; Cynthia Raehl
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  History and Justification of a National Blood Pressure Measurement Validated Device Listing.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Raj S Padwal; Michael Gutkin; Beverly B Green; Michael J Bloch; F Wilford Germino; Domenic A Sica; Anthony J Viera; Benjamin M Bluml; William B White; Sandra J Taler; Steven Yarows; Daichi Shimbo; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Do physicians measure patients' blood pressure, and are those measurements reliable?

Authors:  Şükrü Ulusoy; Gülsüm Özkan; Beyhan Güvercin; Yeliz Sökmen; Yunus Erdem
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Mohammed Siddiqui; Eric Judd; Suzanne Oparil; David Calhoun
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-03-30

5.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans: an AHA scientific statement from the Council on High Blood Pressure Research Professional and Public Education Subcommittee.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John W Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel H Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Uneven Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Measurement: A Multicentric Survey.

Authors:  Maria Elena Flacco; Lamberto Manzoli; Marco Bucci; Lorenzo Capasso; Dania Comparcini; Valentina Simonetti; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Manuela Nocciolini; Claudio D'Amario; Giancarlo Cicolini
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Noncommunicable diseases risk factor surveillance: experience and challenge from India.

Authors:  M Deepa; R Pradeepa; Rm Anjana; V Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 8.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs.

Authors:  Gurmanik Kaur; Ajat Shatru Arora; Vijender Kumar Jain
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Impact of cuff positioning on blood pressure measurement accuracy: may a specially designed cuff make a difference?

Authors:  Grzegorz Bilo; Oscar Sala; Carlotta Perego; Andrea Faini; Lan Gao; Anna Głuszewska; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Dario Pellegrini; Laura Maria Lonati; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.