Values and limitations of pharyngolaryngoscopy (transnasal, transoral) in patients with dysphagia.

During the last decade, videoendoscopic evaluation of structures and sensorimotor functions of the pharynx and larynx has been established as a valuable tool in the assessment of dysphagia. This method is feasible at a very early stage and in critically ill patients, is not invasive and frequently repeatable. Several authors described the high sensitivity and specificity of this method in detecting the presence of the most important symptoms of swallowing dysfunction: retention, penetration and aspiration. In our study of 39 patients with neurogenic dysphagia, we found high agreement between the results of videoendoscopic and videofluoroscopic examination regarding the registration of the most critical symptom, i.e. aspiration. Moreover, we observed patients who aspirated only their saliva and whose endoscopically verified aspiration problem remained undetected by radiographic examination, probably due to the lower sensory input of saliva as compared to a contrast medium. Since the detection of aspiration of saliva is of high clinical relevance for pulmonary function, the endoscopic examination turned out to be superior, in this particular respect, to the radiographic examination. However, the method fails to provide sufficient information regarding the cause of the observed symptoms or the amount of aspirated material. Six patients in our study exhibited, in addition to the neurological signs, structural changes (diverticula, pouches) or unexpected functional esophageal disturbances (persistent opening of the upper esophageal sphincter, retrograde peristalsis) which could only be detected by radiographic examination. The two methods should therefore be considered complementary.