Literature DB >> 10449728

Rapid GTP binding and hydrolysis by G(q) promoted by receptor and GTPase-activating proteins.

S Mukhopadhyay1, E M Ross.   

Abstract

Receptor-promoted GTP binding and GTPase-activating protein (GAP)-promoted GTP hydrolysis determine the onset and termination of G protein signaling; they coordinately control signal amplitude. The mechanisms whereby cells independently regulate signal kinetics and signal amplitude are therefore central to understanding G protein function. We have used quench-flow kinetic methods to measure the rates of the individual reactions of the agonist-stimulated GTPase cycle for G(q) during steady-state signaling. G(q) and m1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor were co-reconstituted into proteoliposomes with one of two GAPs: phospholipase C (PLC)-beta1, the major G(q)-regulated effector protein, and RGS4, a GAP commonly thought to be an inhibitor of G(q) signaling. In this system, the rate constant for GAP-stimulated hydrolysis of Galpha(q)-bound GTP at 30 degrees C was 9-12 s(-1) for PLC-beta1 and 22-27 s(-1) for RGS4. These rates are 1,000- to 2,000-fold faster than in the absence of a GAP and far faster than measured previously. G(q) can thus hydrolyze bound GTP with deactivation half-times of 25-75 ms at 30 degrees C, commensurate with physiological rates of signal termination. GDP/GTP exchange, which reactivates G(q), was the principal rate-limiting step for the GTPase cycle and was also faster than previously thought. At physiological concentrations of GTP, exchange was limited by the rate of dissociation of GDP from the receptor-G(q) complex, with a maximal rate of 1.8 s(-1) at 30 degrees C. Comparison of activation and deactivation rates help explain how GDP/GTP exchange balance rapid GTP hydrolysis to maintain steady-state signal amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10449728      PMCID: PMC22244          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Phospholipase C-beta 1 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gq/11, its physiologic regulator.

Authors:  G Berstein; J L Blank; D Y Jhon; J H Exton; S G Rhee; E M Ross
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Activation of transducin guanosine triphosphatase by two proteins of the RGS family.

Authors:  E R Nekrasova; D M Berman; R R Rustandi; H E Hamm; A G Gilman; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  RGS proteins and signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins.

Authors:  H G Dohlman; J Thorner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  RGS proteins reconstitute the rapid gating kinetics of gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels.

Authors:  C A Doupnik; N Davidson; H A Lester; P Kofuji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants.

Authors:  K Scheffzek; M R Ahmadian; W Kabsch; L Wiesmüller; A Lautwein; F Schmitz; A Wittinghofer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Kinetic control of guanine nucleotide binding to soluble Galpha(q).

Authors:  P Chidiac; V S Markin; E M Ross
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Sst2, a negative regulator of pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression, localization, and genetic interaction and physical association with Gpa1 (the G-protein alpha subunit).

Authors:  H G Dohlman; J Song; D Ma; W E Courchesne; J Thorner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  GAIP and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins for the Gi subfamily of G protein alpha subunits.

Authors:  D M Berman; T M Wilkie; A G Gilman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Regulation of phospholipase C-beta1 by Gq and m1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Steady-state balance of receptor-mediated activation and GTPase-activating protein-promoted deactivation.

Authors:  G H Biddlecome; G Berstein; E M Ross
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins.

Authors:  M R Koelle; H R Horvitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  54 in total

1.  Differential regulation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel kinetics by distinct domains of RGS8.

Authors:  S W Jeong; S R Ikeda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Allosteric inhibition of the regulator of G protein signaling-Galpha protein-protein interaction by CCG-4986.

Authors:  David L Roman; Levi L Blazer; C Aaron Monroy; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  A computational model on the modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Akt pathways in heregulin-induced ErbB signalling.

Authors:  Mariko Hatakeyama; Shuhei Kimura; Takashi Naka; Takuji Kawasaki; Noriko Yumoto; Mio Ichikawa; Jae-Hoon Kim; Kazuki Saito; Mihoro Saeki; Mikako Shirouzu; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Akihiko Konagaya
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Paired turbulence and light do not produce a supralinear calcium increase in Hermissenda.

Authors:  Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  A signal transduction pathway model prototype I: From agonist to cellular endpoint.

Authors:  Thomas J Lukas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Regulators of G-protein signaling accelerate GPCR signaling kinetics and govern sensitivity solely by accelerating GTPase activity.

Authors:  Nevin A Lambert; Christopher A Johnston; Steven D Cappell; Sudhakiranmayi Kuravi; Adam J Kimple; Francis S Willard; David P Siderovski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pleiotropic phenotype of a genomic knock-in of an RGS-insensitive G184S Gnai2 allele.

Authors:  Xinyan Huang; Ying Fu; Raelene A Charbeneau; Thomas L Saunders; Douglas K Taylor; Kurt D Hankenson; Mark W Russell; Louis G D'Alecy; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction.

Authors:  Scott J Bornheimer; Mano R Maurya; Marilyn Gist Farquhar; Shankar Subramaniam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Regulation of RGS5 GAP activity by GPSM3.

Authors:  Peishen Zhao; Peter Chidiac
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Subcellular interactions between parallel fibre and climbing fibre signals in Purkinje cells predict sensitivity of classical conditioning to interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski; David Lester; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.