Literature DB >> 10449503

Evaluation of two rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A in stool specimens.

D P Fedorko1, H D Engler, E M O'Shaughnessy, E C Williams, C J Reichelderfer, W I Smith.   

Abstract

Rapid laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is highly desirable in the setting of hospital cost containment. We tested 654 stool specimens to compare the performance of two assays for rapid detection of toxin A, the Immunocard Toxin A test (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.) and the Culturette Brand Toxin CD enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems), with a cytotoxin assay (Cytotoxi Test; Advanced Clinical Diagnostics) and culture on cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar followed by determination of the production of toxins A and B. A chart review was performed for patients whose stool specimens provided positive results on one to three of the assays. With the "gold standard" of all four assays positive or chart review evidence of CDAD, 97 (14.8%) stool specimens were positive by one or more assays and 557 (85.2%) were negative by all methods. Total agreement for all assays was 90.5% (592 of 654). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for toxigenic culture were 94.7, 98.6, 87.1, and 99.5%, respectively, for toxigenic culture; 87.7, 98.6, 86.2, and 98.8%, respectively, for the cytotoxin assay; 71.9, 99.3, 91.1, and 97.3%, respectively, for the Immunocard; and 68.4, 99.1, 88.6, and 96.9%, respectively, for the Culturette EIA. While easy to perform and highly specific, these rapid assays do not appear to be sufficient for accurate diagnosis of CDAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10449503      PMCID: PMC85451     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Multicenter evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile enterotoxin A.

Authors:  P C De Girolami; P A Hanff; K Eichelberger; L Longhi; H Teresa; J Pratt; A Cheng; J M Letourneau; G M Thorne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Results of a prospective, 18-month clinical evaluation of culture, cytotoxin testing, and culturette brand (CDT) latex testing in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  L R Peterson; M M Olson; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Multicenter evaluation of four methods for Clostridium difficile detection: ImmunoCard C. difficile, cytotoxin assay, culture, and latex agglutination.

Authors:  J L Staneck; L S Weckbach; S D Allen; J A Siders; P H Gilligan; G Coppitt; J A Kraft; D H Willis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile colitis.

Authors:  C P Kelly; C Pothoulakis; J T LaMont
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhea: characteristics of and risk factors for patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R Fekety; L V McFarland; C M Surawicz; R N Greenberg; G W Elmer; M E Mulligan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Use of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and L-proline-aminopeptidase (PRO Discs) in the rapid identification of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  D P Fedorko; E C Williams
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  F Barbut; C Kajzer; N Planas; J C Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Single toxin detection is inadequate to diagnose Clostridium difficile diarrhea in pediatric patients.

Authors:  H A Kader; D A Piccoli; A F Jawad; K L McGowan; E S Maller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis.

Authors:  F C Knoop; M Owens; I C Crocker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; L A Barroso; T D Wilkins; C Depitre; G Corthier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  10 in total

1.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay for combined detection of stool toxins and toxigenic C. difficile strains.

Authors:  A Lozniewski; C Rabaud; E Dotto; M Weber; F Mory
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  D O'Connor; P Hynes; M Cormican; E Collins; G Corbett-Feeney; M Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clostridium Difficile Colitis in Trauma Patients - a Global Step by Step Review.

Authors:  Silviu Morteanu; Georgiana Chirt; Mircea Beuran
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  Update on Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  C S Alcantara; R L Guerrant
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-08

6.  Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples.

Authors:  Charles Darkoh; Herbert L Dupont; Heidi B Kaplan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  David K Turgeon; Thomas J Novicki; John Quick; LaDonna Carlson; Pat Miller; Bruce Ulness; Anne Cent; Rhoda Ashley; Ann Larson; Marie Coyle; Ajit P Limaye; Brad T Cookson; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Simon D Bélanger; Maurice Boissinot; Natalie Clairoux; François J Picard; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Munshi Moyenuddin; John C Williamson; Christopher A Ohl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

10.  False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.

Authors:  Yanal M Murad; Justo Perez; Gustavo Ybazeta; Sarah Mavin; Sebastien Lefebvre; J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Reza Nokhbeh
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.090

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.