Literature DB >> 10449212

Comparison between isosorbide dinitrate aerosol and nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies.

A F Rubio-Guerra1, G Vargas-Ayala, J J Lozano-Nuevo, J L Narvaez-Rivera, L Rodriguez-Lopez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide donors have been used in the management of hypertensive emergencies (HE). Isosorbide dinitrate aerosol (ISA) is a nitric oxide fast-acting donor. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ISA and nifedipine in the treatment of HE.
METHODS: Sixty adult patients with an HE were randomised to receive either ISA (2.5 mg) or nifedipine (10 mg). Patients were given an electrocardiogram (ECG) immediately prior, and 30 min after administering the medication. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 5 min for the first 30 min, and then every 30 min for a period of 6 h.
RESULTS: Blood pressure values for all patients in the ISA group decreased significantly (187 +/- 13/121 +/- 6 to 153 +/- 15/92.3 +/- 7.6 mmHg, P < 0.005). Two of the patients in this group had angor pectoris with evidence of subepicardial ischaemia as seen in the first ECG, both of which disappeared with the drug. Heart rate decreased by 14%. Similarly, all patients in the nifedipine group had significant decreases in BP (190 +/- 23/115 +/- 7 to 153 +/- 26/86 +/- 6 mm Hg, P < 0.005). Their first ECG was normal. Two patients suffered angor pectoris after nifedipine, with subepicardial ischaemia registering in the second ECG. Heart rate increased 11.9% in this group. During the follow-up period, no clinically significant side effects or cases of rebound hypertension were observed in the ISA group, whereas in the nifedipine group, eight patients reported having headaches and four others rebound hypertension.
CONCLUSION: Our results show a favourable effect of ISA in the treatment of HE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10449212     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  4 in total

1.  Differences in Diagnosis and Management of Hypertensive Urgencies and Emergencies According to Italian Doctors from Different Departments Who Deal With Acute Increase in Blood Pressure-Data from Gear (Gestione Dell'emergenza e Urgenza in ARea Critica) Study.

Authors:  Francesca Saladini; Costantino Mancusi; Fabio Bertacchini; Francesco Spannella; Alessandro Maloberti; Alessandra Giavarini; Martina Rosticci; Rosa Maria Bruno; Giacomo Pucci; Davide Grassi; Martino Pengo; Maria Lorenza Muiesan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Pharmacological interventions for hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  M I Perez; V M Musini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

3.  Treatment of hypertension in the inpatient setting: use of intravenous labetalol and hydralazine.

Authors:  Alan B Weder; Steven Erickson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Is tetrahydrobiopterin a therapeutic option in diabetic hypertensive patients?

Authors:  Alberto Francisco Rubio-Guerra; Hilda Vargas-Robles; Luz Maria Ramos-Brizuela; Bruno Alfonso Escalante-Acosta
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2010-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.