M C Chamberlain1, P Kormanik. 1. Kaiser Permanente, Department of Neurology, Baldwin Park, California 91706, USA. marc.c.chamberlain@kp.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A prospective Phase II study of Taxol in young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (15 men; 9 women) ages 19-45 years (median 31.5), with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery and involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 60 Gy; range 51-61 Gy). Additionally, 22 patients were treated adjuvantly with nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (PCV in 17; BCNU in 5). Fourteen patients were treated with salvage chemotherapy at first recurrence with 1-2 chemotherapy regimens (median 1). Taxol was administered at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 given as a 3 h intravenous infusion monthly. Neurological and neuroradiographic evaluation were performed every 8 weeks after 2 courses of Taxol, operationally defined as a single cycle of Taxol. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable. A median of 3.5 cycles of Taxol (range 1-13) were administered. Taxol-related toxicity included: partial alopecia (13 patients); non-disabling peripheral neuropathy (4); neutropenia (4); anemia (3); and thrombocytopenia (2). Four patients required transfusions (2 packed red blood cell; 2 platelet) and one patient was treated for culture negative neutropenic fever. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients (13%) demonstrated a neuroradiographic partial response, 16 patients (67%) demonstrated stable disease and 5 patients (21%) had progressive disease following a single cycle of Taxol. Time to tumor progression ranged from 2-26 months (median 7.5 months). Nineteen patients were offered alternative chemotherapy after failing Taxol of whom 13 clinically responded. Survival ranged from 3-56 months (median 18.5 months). Four patients are alive, all are on alternative chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol demonstrated modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in this heavily pre-treated cohort of young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas.
BACKGROUND: A prospective Phase II study of Taxol in young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (15 men; 9 women) ages 19-45 years (median 31.5), with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery and involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 60 Gy; range 51-61 Gy). Additionally, 22 patients were treated adjuvantly with nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (PCV in 17; BCNU in 5). Fourteen patients were treated with salvage chemotherapy at first recurrence with 1-2 chemotherapy regimens (median 1). Taxol was administered at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 given as a 3 h intravenous infusion monthly. Neurological and neuroradiographic evaluation were performed every 8 weeks after 2 courses of Taxol, operationally defined as a single cycle of Taxol. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable. A median of 3.5 cycles of Taxol (range 1-13) were administered. Taxol-related toxicity included: partial alopecia (13 patients); non-disabling peripheral neuropathy (4); neutropenia (4); anemia (3); and thrombocytopenia (2). Four patients required transfusions (2 packed red blood cell; 2 platelet) and one patient was treated for culture negative neutropenic fever. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients (13%) demonstrated a neuroradiographic partial response, 16 patients (67%) demonstrated stable disease and 5 patients (21%) had progressive disease following a single cycle of Taxol. Time to tumor progression ranged from 2-26 months (median 7.5 months). Nineteen patients were offered alternative chemotherapy after failing Taxol of whom 13 clinically responded. Survival ranged from 3-56 months (median 18.5 months). Four patients are alive, all are on alternative chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS:Taxol demonstrated modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in this heavily pre-treated cohort of young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas.
Authors: W P Mason; A Grovas; S Halpern; I J Dunkel; J Garvin; G Heller; M Rosenblum; S Gardner; D Lyden; S Sands; D Puccetti; K Lindsley; T E Merchant; B O'Malley; L Bayer; M M Petriccione; J Allen; J L Finlay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David M Peereboom; Jeffrey G Supko; Kathryn A Carson; Tracy Batchelor; Surasak Phuphanich; Glenn Lesser; Tom Mikkelsen; Tom Mikkelson; Joy Fisher; Serena Desideri; Xiaoying He; Stuart A Grossman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kajetan L von Eckardstein; Stephan Patt; Christine Kratzel; Jürgen C W Kiwit; Regina Reszka Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: James M Markert; Peter G Liechty; Wenquan Wang; Shanna Gaston; Eunice Braz; Matthias Karrasch; Louis B Nabors; Michael Markiewicz; Alfred D Lakeman; Cheryl A Palmer; Jacqueline N Parker; Richard J Whitley; George Y Gillespie Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: S Chibbaro; L Benvenuti; A Caprio; S Carnesecchi; F Pulerà; F Faggionato; D Serino; C Galli; M Andreuccetti; N Buxton; R Gagliardi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: A Régina; M Demeule; C Ché; I Lavallée; J Poirier; R Gabathuler; R Béliveau; J-P Castaigne Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 8.739