Literature DB >> 10447860

Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity.

D W Coltman1, D R Bancroft, A Robertson, J A Smith, T H Clutton-Brock, J M Pemberton.   

Abstract

Molecular techniques have enabled behavioural ecologists to reassess mating systems from a genetic perspective. Studies of paternity frequently reveal that mating behaviour does not always reflect parentage, and may bring to light alternative mating tactics. Here we present a comparison of behavioural and genetic measures of male reproductive success in a mammalian mating system in which both sexes are highly promiscuous. Rather than having a stable harem social structure, Soay rams (Ovis aries) on the island of Hirta, St Kilda, UK usually consort with individual oestrous ewes sequentially. Not all matings occur between consort pairs, however, and ewes have been seen to mate with up to 10 different rams on the same day. Using locus-specific polymorphism at five protein and 10 microsatellite DNA loci, we determined paternity for 236 lambs born into three cohorts, and compared paternity with estimates of mating success derived from more than one census of rutting behaviour. The correlation between the number of ewes with which each ram was witnessed in consort and the number of paternities assigned was positive and statistically significant, and rams that were observed in consort with a ewe were 18 times more likely to have sired her offspring than other candidate rams. However, most lambs (73%) were not sired by a ram seen in consort with the oestrous mother. Many juveniles, yearlings and some adult rams were rarely seen in consort with ewes, yet were assigned a significant number of paternities. These results suggest that mating tactics differ between age groups, and that alternative mating strategies among adults that do not involve forming consorts with many females also confer mating success. For these reasons, census-based observations of consort associations between individuals cannot be used to accurately estimate individual male reproductive success in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10447860     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  18 in total

1.  Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  J Hunt; L W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees.

Authors:  T C Marshall; D W Coltman; J M Pemberton; J Slate; J A Spalton; F E Guinness; J A Smith; J G Pilkington; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; T Coulson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Costs of mating competition limit male lifetime breeding success in polygynous mammals.

Authors:  Dieter Lukas; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams.

Authors:  D W Coltman; M Festa-Bianchet; J T Jorgenson; C Strobeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genetic monogamy and biparental care in an externally fertilizing fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides).

Authors:  J A DeWoody; D E Fletcher; S D Wilkins; W S Nelson; J C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A MOLECULAR EXAMINATION OF RELATEDNESS, MULTIPLE PATERNITY, AND COHABITATION OF THE SOUTHERN PLAINS WOODRAT (NEOTOMA MICROPUS).

Authors:  B Dnate' Baxter; Francisca M Mendez-Harclerode; Charles F Fulhorst; Robert D Bradley
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.

Authors:  Emily E Wroblewski; Carson M Murray; Brandon F Keele; Joann C Schumacher-Stankey; Beatrice H Hahn; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 10.  Using genetics to understand the dynamics of wild primate populations.

Authors:  Linda Vigilant; Katerina Guschanski
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 2.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.