BACKGROUND: Despite advances in neuroimaging and neurosurgical treatment, spinal epidural abscess remains a challenging problem; early diagnosis is often difficult and treatment is delayed. Optimal management is unclear, and morbidity and mortality are significant. To define contemporary trends in etiology and management, and establish diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, we reviewed our 10-year experience with spinal epidural abscess. METHODS: We examined medical records, laboratory data, radiological (CT and MRI) studies, and operative reports from 75 cases of spinal epidural abscess between 1983 and 1992. Demographic characteristics, frequency, clinical features, pathogens, risk factors, surgical and medical treatment, and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in the frequency of spinal epidural abscess over the 10-year period (p-value = 0.0195). Intravenous drug abuse was present in 28 patients (33%), diabetes mellitus in 22 patients (27%), and prior spinal surgery in 11 patients (17%). Back pain, progressive neurologic deficit, and low grade fever remained the distinguishing diagnostic features. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated in 48 of 50 patients (95%); peripheral leukocyte count was elevated in 45 patients (60%). MRI was the most effective technique for diagnosing spinal epidural abscess, revealing or suggesting the diagnosis in all 59 patients (100%) studied. Sites of spinal epidural abscess were equally distributed along the spinal axis. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant organism (67% of patients, with 15% having a methicillin-resistant strain); 8% of patients had Streptococcal species. Most patients had open surgical drainage followed by prolonged antibiotic treatment; 22 patients were managed with antibiotics alone; 50 patients (66%) had a good clinical outcome after treatment. Multiple medical problems, prior spinal surgery, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococci were correlated with a significantly worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess is increasing. To prevent serious morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis is essential. Patients with localized back pain who are at risk for developing such abscesses or who have an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or neurologic deficit should have an immediate MRI scan with contrast enhancement. Surgical drainage and prolonged antibiotic use are the cornerstones of treatment, although selected patients may be treated conservatively.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in neuroimaging and neurosurgical treatment, spinal epidural abscess remains a challenging problem; early diagnosis is often difficult and treatment is delayed. Optimal management is unclear, and morbidity and mortality are significant. To define contemporary trends in etiology and management, and establish diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, we reviewed our 10-year experience with spinal epidural abscess. METHODS: We examined medical records, laboratory data, radiological (CT and MRI) studies, and operative reports from 75 cases of spinal epidural abscess between 1983 and 1992. Demographic characteristics, frequency, clinical features, pathogens, risk factors, surgical and medical treatment, and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in the frequency of spinal epidural abscess over the 10-year period (p-value = 0.0195). Intravenous drug abuse was present in 28 patients (33%), diabetes mellitus in 22 patients (27%), and prior spinal surgery in 11 patients (17%). Back pain, progressive neurologic deficit, and low grade fever remained the distinguishing diagnostic features. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated in 48 of 50 patients (95%); peripheral leukocyte count was elevated in 45 patients (60%). MRI was the most effective technique for diagnosing spinal epidural abscess, revealing or suggesting the diagnosis in all 59 patients (100%) studied. Sites of spinal epidural abscess were equally distributed along the spinal axis. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant organism (67% of patients, with 15% having a methicillin-resistant strain); 8% of patients had Streptococcal species. Most patients had open surgical drainage followed by prolonged antibiotic treatment; 22 patients were managed with antibiotics alone; 50 patients (66%) had a good clinical outcome after treatment. Multiple medical problems, prior spinal surgery, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococci were correlated with a significantly worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess is increasing. To prevent serious morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis is essential. Patients with localized back pain who are at risk for developing such abscesses or who have an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or neurologic deficit should have an immediate MRI scan with contrast enhancement. Surgical drainage and prolonged antibiotic use are the cornerstones of treatment, although selected patients may be treated conservatively.