Literature DB >> 10447075

An imposed oscillating electrical field improves the recovery of function in neurologically complete paraplegic dogs.

R B Borgens1, J P Toombs, G Breur, W R Widmer, D Waters, A M Harbath, P March, L G Adams.   

Abstract

We show that an applied electric field in which the polarity is reversed every 15 minutes can improve the outcome from severe, acute spinal cord injury in dogs. This study utilized naturally injured, neurologically complete paraplegic dogs as a model for human spinal cord injury. The recovery of paraplegic dogs treated with oscillating electric field stimulation (OFS) (approximately 500 to 600 microV/mm; n = 20) was compared with that of sham-treated animals (n = 14). Active and sham stimulators were fabricated in West Lafayette, Indiana. They were coded, randomized, sterilized, and packaged in Warsaw, Indiana, and returned to Purdue University for blinded surgical implantation. The stimulators were of a previously unpublished design and meet the requirements for phase I human clinical testing. All dogs were treated within 18 days of the onset of paraplegia. During the experimental applications, all received the highest standard of conventional management, including surgical decompression, spinal stabilization (if required), and acute administration of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. A radiologic and neurologic examination was performed on every dog entering the study, the latter consisting of standard reflex testing, urologic tests, urodynamic testing, tests for deep and superficial pain appreciation, proprioceptive placing of the hind limbs, ambulation, and evoked potential testing. Dogs were evaluated before and after surgery and at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. A greater proportion of experimentally treated dogs than of sham-treated animals showed improvement in every category of functional evaluation at both the 6-week and 6-month recheck, with no reverse trend. Statistical significance was not reached in comparisons of some individual categories of functional evaluation between sham-treated and OFS-treated dogs (ambulation, proprioceptive placing); an early trend towards significance was shown in others (deep pain), and significance was reached in evaluations of superficial pain appreciation. An average of all individual scores for all categories of blinded behavioral evaluation (combined neurologic score) was used to compare group outcomes. At the 6-month recheck period, the combined neurologic score of OFS-treated dogs was significantly better than that of control dogs (p = 0.047; Mann-Whitney, two-tailed).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10447075     DOI: 10.1089/neu.1999.16.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  27 in total

Review 1.  Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  Electrical stimulation of schwann cells promotes sustained increases in neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Abigail N Koppes; Andrea L Nordberg; Gina M Paolillo; Nicole M Goodsell; Haley A Darwish; Linxia Zhang; Deanna M Thompson
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  A simplified method of walking track analysis to assess short-term locomotor recovery after acute spinal cord injury caused by thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion in dogs.

Authors:  R B Song; M S Oldach; D M Basso; R C da Costa; L C Fisher; X Mo; S A Moore
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Robust neurite extension following exogenous electrical stimulation within single walled carbon nanotube-composite hydrogels.

Authors:  A N Koppes; K W Keating; A L McGregor; R A Koppes; K R Kearns; A M Ziemba; C A McKay; J M Zuidema; C J Rivet; R J Gilbert; D M Thompson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Quantifying center of pressure variability in chondrodystrophoid dogs.

Authors:  S R Blau; L M Davis; A M Gorney; C S Dohse; K D Williams; J-H Lim; W G Pfitzner; E Laber; G S Sawicki; N J Olby
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  Spinal cord injury II: Prognostic indicators, standards of care, and clinical trials.

Authors:  Aubrey A Webb; Sybil Ngan; David Fowler
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 8.  Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview.

Authors:  Samar Hamid; Ray Hayek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  ElectroTaxis-on-a-Chip (ETC): an integrated quantitative high-throughput screening platform for electrical field-directed cell migration.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Kan Zhu; Yan Zhang; Zijie Zhu; Zhengping Xu; Min Zhao; Tingrui Pan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Chick embryonic Schwann cells migrate anodally in small electrical fields.

Authors:  Marilyn J McKasson; Ling Huang; Kenneth R Robinson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.