R Miller1, R Newcomer, P Fox. 1. Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 94118, USA.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Did the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration, with its goal of improving caregiver outcomes through case management and subsidized community services, affect the nursing home entry rate of treatments with dementia compared to controls? DATA SOURCES: Interviews conducted at baseline and six months thereafter. Measures include date of nursing home entry, client and caregiver health, and income. STUDY DESIGN: The demonstration randomly assigned voluntary applicants into treatment and control groups. Treatment group cases were eligible for case management and for an 80 percent discount on community care benefits, up to about $600 per month. DATA COLLECTION: All cases received baseline and semi-annual assessment interviews for up to three years after enrollment. Analyses are among cases that remained in the demonstration for more than 30 days after enrollment (n = 8,095). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The intervention of case management and subsidized community service had no effect on nursing home entry rates for treatments overall, compared to those of controls, and few effects on treatment subgroups, with the exception of one site where it may have increased nursing home entry rates. CONCLUSIONS: Providing case management and subsidized community services with the goal of improving caregiver outcomes may have little effect on nursing home entry rates for people with dementia.
RCT Entities:
STUDY QUESTION: Did the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration, with its goal of improving caregiver outcomes through case management and subsidized community services, affect the nursing home entry rate of treatments with dementia compared to controls? DATA SOURCES: Interviews conducted at baseline and six months thereafter. Measures include date of nursing home entry, client and caregiver health, and income. STUDY DESIGN: The demonstration randomly assigned voluntary applicants into treatment and control groups. Treatment group cases were eligible for case management and for an 80 percent discount on community care benefits, up to about $600 per month. DATA COLLECTION: All cases received baseline and semi-annual assessment interviews for up to three years after enrollment. Analyses are among cases that remained in the demonstration for more than 30 days after enrollment (n = 8,095). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The intervention of case management and subsidized community service had no effect on nursing home entry rates for treatments overall, compared to those of controls, and few effects on treatment subgroups, with the exception of one site where it may have increased nursing home entry rates. CONCLUSIONS: Providing case management and subsidized community services with the goal of improving caregiver outcomes may have little effect on nursing home entry rates for people with dementia.
Authors: D L Bachman; P A Wolf; R T Linn; J E Knoefel; J L Cobb; A J Belanger; L R White; R B D'Agostino Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rolf Holle; Elmar Grässel; Stefan Ruckdäschel; Sonja Wunder; Hilmar Mehlig; Peter Marx; Olaf Pirk; Martin Butzlaff; Simone Kunz; Jörg Lauterberg Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 2.655