AIMS: Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for compromised wound healing. The present study examines the restoration of the epidermal barrier function using the suction blister wound model. METHODS: The healing process was evaluated over time by measuring water evaporation (WE) and blood flow (BF) in the wound area. Seventeen Type 1 diabetic males and 11 non-diabetic control males were studied. RESULTS: At the onset, the WE of diabetic patients was 116 +/- 11 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 95 +/- 13 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.001). On the second day, the WE of diabetic patients was 90 +/- 21 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 60 +/- 24 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.02). The most profound difference was encountered during the fourth day, when the WE of diabetic patients was 40 +/- 17 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 14 +/- 8 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.001). The value recorded on the fourth day was 37% of the onset value in diabetic patients and 16% in controls (P < 0.001). Eight days after wounding the values were close to that of normal skin in both diabetic and control subjects. At the onset, the BF was 93 +/- 20 (arbitrary units) in diabetic men and 112 +/- 18 in controls (P = 0.02). On the second, fourth and eighth day there was no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that restoration of the epidermal barrier function is delayed in the patients with diabetes. There were also a trend toward an initially weaker inflammatory response.
AIMS: Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for compromised wound healing. The present study examines the restoration of the epidermal barrier function using the suction blister wound model. METHODS: The healing process was evaluated over time by measuring water evaporation (WE) and blood flow (BF) in the wound area. Seventeen Type 1 diabetic males and 11 non-diabetic control males were studied. RESULTS: At the onset, the WE of diabeticpatients was 116 +/- 11 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 95 +/- 13 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.001). On the second day, the WE of diabeticpatients was 90 +/- 21 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 60 +/- 24 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.02). The most profound difference was encountered during the fourth day, when the WE of diabeticpatients was 40 +/- 17 g x m(-2) x h(-1) and that of controls 14 +/- 8 g x m(-2) x h(-1) (P < 0.001). The value recorded on the fourth day was 37% of the onset value in diabeticpatients and 16% in controls (P < 0.001). Eight days after wounding the values were close to that of normal skin in both diabetic and control subjects. At the onset, the BF was 93 +/- 20 (arbitrary units) in diabeticmen and 112 +/- 18 in controls (P = 0.02). On the second, fourth and eighth day there was no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that restoration of the epidermal barrier function is delayed in the patients with diabetes. There were also a trend toward an initially weaker inflammatory response.
Authors: Marjo Koskela; Fiia Gäddnäs; Tero I Ala-Kokko; Jouko J Laurila; Juha Saarnio; Aarne Oikarinen; Vesa Koivukangas Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 9.097