Literature DB >> 10444731

Combined alpha fetoprotein testing and ultrasonography as a screening test for primary liver cancer.

B Zhang1, B Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity and cost of a screening test for primary liver cancer using combined serum alpha fetoprotein testing and ultrasonography.
SETTING: An urban community in Shanghai, China.
METHODS: 9373 subjects aged 35 to 59 with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or chronic hepatitis were studied. Outcome measures were detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value, the cost for each primary liver cancer detected, and the average cost of detecting each additional primary liver cancer by the combined method. The number of small primary liver cancers detected was used for the economic evaluation.
RESULTS: 20,294 screening examinations were carried out. Primary liver cancer was detected in 51 subjects, 36 of whom had small primary liver cancer. When alpha fetoprotein and ultrasonography were used in parallel the detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value were 92%, 7.5%, and 3.0%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 30,206 RMB (Chinese currency, $3639). When ultrasonography was used alone the detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value were 84%, 2.9%, and 6.6%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 16,451 RMB ($1982). When the alpha fetoprotein test was used alone the detection rate, false positive rate, and positive predictive value were 69%, 5.0%, and 3.3%, respectively; the cost for each primary liver cancer detected was 25,139 RMB ($3029).
CONCLUSION: The combination of both screening methods results in a relatively small increase in detection but a considerably higher false positive rate, increasing the costs. The combined test may be the best choice for primary liver cancer screening in developed areas of China, but otherwise, ultrasonography alone is the method of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444731     DOI: 10.1136/jms.6.2.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  52 in total

1.  Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does the Place Where Ultrasound Is Performed Impact Its Effectiveness?

Authors:  Federico Piñero; Fernando Rubinstein; Sebastián Marciano; Nora Fernández; Jorge Silva; Yanina Zambelo; Margarita Anders; Alina Zerega; Ezequiel Ridruejo; Carlos Miguez; Beatriz Ameigeiras; Claudia D'Amico; Luis Gaite; Carla Bermúdez; Carlos Rosales; Gustavo Romero; Lucas McCormack; Virginia Reggiardo; Luis Colombato; Adrián Gadano; Marcelo Silva
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Efficacy of ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein on early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fen-Yu Ren; Xi-Xu Piao; Ai-Lian Jin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Knowledge of hepatocellular carcinoma screening guidelines and clinical practices among gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Sameer D Saini; Latoya B Kuhn; Joel H Rubenstein; Darrell S Pardi; Jorge A Marrero; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Thomas A Abrams; Edgar Ben-Josef; P Mark Bloomston; Jean F Botha; Bryan M Clary; Anne Covey; Steven A Curley; Michael I D'Angelica; Rene Davila; William D Ensminger; John F Gibbs; Daniel Laheru; Mokenge P Malafa; Jorge Marrero; Steven G Meranze; Sean J Mulvihill; James O Park; James A Posey; Jasgit Sachdev; Riad Salem; Elin R Sigurdson; Constantinos Sofocleous; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Alan P Venook; Laura Williams Goff; Yun Yen; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Over-expression of IMPDH2 is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying He; Zhousan Zheng; Yi Xu; Huiwen Weng; Ying Gao; Kai Qin; Jian Rong; Cui Chen; Miao Yun; Jiaxing Zhang; Sheng Ye
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of population-based screening of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparing ultrasonography with two-stage screening.

Authors:  Ming-Jeng Kuo; Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Chi-Ling Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Yu-Min Lin; Chao-Sheng Liao; Hung-Chuen Chang; Yueh-Shih Lin; Amy Ming-Fang Yen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeyamani Ramachandran
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-21

Review 8.  Contribution of alpha-fetoprotein in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bérénice Charrière; Charlotte Maulat; Bertrand Suc; Fabrice Muscari
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 9.  Nanoparticles for targeted delivery of therapeutics and small interfering RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jaleh Varshosaz; Maryam Farzan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Exploring the cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastric cancer in China in anticipation of clinical trial results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yeh; Karen M Kuntz; Majid Ezzati; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.