OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument for provider organizations, consumers, purchasers, and policy makers to measure and compare the development of quality systems in provider organizations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of provider organizations using a structured questionnaire to survey managers. SETTING: The Netherlands. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Provider organizations of six health care fields: primary health care, care for the disabled, mental health care, care for the elderly, hospital care and welfare care. MAIN MEASURES: Existence of quality assurance and quality improvement activities. RESULTS: The study presents a survey instrument for assessing the quality assurance and improvement activities of health care provider organizations and the developmental stage of quality systems. The survey instrument distinguishes five focal areas for quality improvement activities and four developmental stages. The study also reports data on the reliability and validity of the survey instrument. CONCLUSION: The instrument is reliable, easy to administer, and useful across health care fields as well as different kinds of organizations. Developing quality systems provide a common language across all parts of the health care sector. By assigning the activities to focal areas and developmental stages the instrument gives insight into the implementation of quality systems in health care. Comparable information on quality assurance activities increases the accountability of providers. Because of the efficient (not time consuming) approach, the instrument complements existing accreditation reviews.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument for provider organizations, consumers, purchasers, and policy makers to measure and compare the development of quality systems in provider organizations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of provider organizations using a structured questionnaire to survey managers. SETTING: The Netherlands. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Provider organizations of six health care fields: primary health care, care for the disabled, mental health care, care for the elderly, hospital care and welfare care. MAIN MEASURES: Existence of quality assurance and quality improvement activities. RESULTS: The study presents a survey instrument for assessing the quality assurance and improvement activities of health care provider organizations and the developmental stage of quality systems. The survey instrument distinguishes five focal areas for quality improvement activities and four developmental stages. The study also reports data on the reliability and validity of the survey instrument. CONCLUSION: The instrument is reliable, easy to administer, and useful across health care fields as well as different kinds of organizations. Developing quality systems provide a common language across all parts of the health care sector. By assigning the activities to focal areas and developmental stages the instrument gives insight into the implementation of quality systems in health care. Comparable information on quality assurance activities increases the accountability of providers. Because of the efficient (not time consuming) approach, the instrument complements existing accreditation reviews.
Authors: Oliver Groene; Niek Klazinga; Cordula Wagner; Onyebuchi A Arah; Andrew Thompson; Charles Bruneau; Rosa Suñol Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Judith A Hinchey; Timothy Shephard; Sarah T Tonn; Robin Ruthazer; Richard C Hermann; Harry P Selker; David M Kent Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Oliver Groene; Nuria Mora; Andrew Thompson; Mercedes Saez; Mercè Casas; Rosa Suñol Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Antje Hammer; Onyebuchi A Arah; Maral Dersarkissian; Caroline A Thompson; Russell Mannion; Cordula Wagner; Oliver Ommen; Rosa Sunol; Holger Pfaff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marjo J E Campmans-Kuijpers; Lidwien C Lemmens; Caroline A Baan; Kees J Gorter; Jolanda Groothuis; Klementine H van Vuure; Guy E H M Rutten Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rosa Sunol; Cordula Wagner; Onyebuchi A Arah; Solvejg Kristensen; Holger Pfaff; Niek Klazinga; Caroline A Thompson; Aolin Wang; Maral DerSarkissian; Paul Bartels; Philippe Michel; Oliver Groene Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daan Botje; N S Klazinga; R Suñol; O Groene; H Pfaff; R Mannion; A Depaigne-Loth; O A Arah; M Dersarkissian; C Wagner Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 2.038