Literature DB >> 10442349

Discussing disease progression and end-of-life decisions.

W F Baile1, G A Glober, R Lenzi, E A Beale, A P Kudelka.   

Abstract

Because most patients now want to know the truth about their diagnosis and prognosis, the ability to discuss the cancer diagnosis, disease recurrence, or treatment failure, and to solicit patients' views about resuscitation or hospice care, are important verbal skills for oncologists and other oncology health care providers. Moreover, the ability to clearly articulate a treatment plan or elicit patient preferences for treatment are a prerequisite to informed consent. Despite these imperatives, clinicians do not routinely receive training in key communication skills that could enable them to accomplish these tasks. A body of literature is available, however, that identifies communication strategies that can (1) facilitate the establishment of a close rapport with the patient, (2) identify the patient's information preferences, (3) ensure comprehension of key knowledge and information, (4) address the patient's emotions in a supportive fashion, (5) elicit the patient's key concerns, and (6) involve the patient in the treatment plan. In this article, we use dialogues between a physician and a hypothetical patient with advanced ovarian cancer to illustrate how communication techniques can be applied to accomplish these goals. We identify important benefits of the use of these techniques for both the physician and patient, and pose several questions regarding the training of physicians in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10442349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  12 in total

1.  One example is worth a million words.

Authors:  R Buckman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  National survey of psychologists' training and practice in breaking bad news: a mixed methods study of the MUM effect.

Authors:  Brad M Merker; William E Hanson; John M Poston
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2010-09

3.  Missed opportunities for advance care planning communication during outpatient clinic visits.

Authors:  Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Jennifer R Levin; Karl A Lorenz; Howard S Gordon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Information giving and receiving in hematological malignancy consultations.

Authors:  Stewart C Alexander; Amy M Sullivan; Anthony L Back; James A Tulsky; Roberta E Goldman; Susan D Block; Susan K Stewart; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Palliative Care Training during Fellowship: A National Survey of U.S. Hematology and Oncology Fellows.

Authors:  Roby A Thomas; Brendan Curley; Sijin Wen; Jianjun Zhang; Jame Abraham; Alvin H Moss
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Missed opportunities: use of an end-of-life symptom management order protocol among inpatients dying expected deaths.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Susan L Ettner; Tod Barry; Myrtle C Yamamoto; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 7.  Prognostic disclosure in oncology - current communication models: a scoping review.

Authors:  Julie Rachel Bloom; Deborah Catherine Marshall; Carlos Rodriguez-Russo; Emily Martin; Joshua Adam Jones; Kavita Vyas Dharmarajan
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.633

8.  The Lake Wobegon effect: are all cancer patients above average?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Wolf; Kevin S Wolf
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Patient-physician communication about code status preferences: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wadih Rhondali; Pedro Perez-Cruz; David Hui; Gary B Chisholm; Shalini Dalal; Walter Baile; Eva Chittenden; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Assessment of palliative care training in gynecologic oncology: a gynecologic oncology fellow research network study.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; Kathryn Osann; Elizabeth Dickson; Laura L Holman; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Lori Spoozak; Eijean Wu; Lauren Krill; Amanda Nickles Fader; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.