Literature DB >> 10442075

Detection of loose bodies in joints.

S Bianchi1, C Martinoli.   

Abstract

The ability of US to diagnose intra-articular loose bodies greatly depends on a high degree of suspicion of the examiner, related to the knowledge of radiographic and clinical findings. Nowadays, radiography is still the modality of choice when a loose body is suspected on clinical grounds. Plain films are panoramic and not expensive. If a calcified image consistent with a loose body is shown on radiographs, US can be performed to prove its intra-articular location and rule out para-articular calcification. The size, position (recess, bursa), and macroscopic composition (osseous, osteochondral) of loose bodies can be reliably evaluated. Additional findings, including mobility of loose bodies, presence of joint effusion, and synovial proliferation, can also be assessed with US. Detailed knowledge of the normal anatomy of joints and related structures is, of course, an essential requirement to investigate loose bodies. If the fragment is not found in the expected location, other joint recesses and bursae must be explored, because a fragment can change position with time. In addition, the US appearance of loose bodies has to be known by sonographers dealing with the musculoskeletal system because an intra-articular fragment can be found during routine examination of a joint performed before standard radiographs. There are a number of limitations on the clinical usefulness of US in this field. Although US is able to differentiate between single and multiple loose bodies, the exact number of the fragments cannot always be established. In osteochondral fractures, information on the posttraumatic damage to other intra-articular structures, such as ligaments or menisci, cannot be obtained by US. Furthermore, because US can evaluate only a portion of the articular surface, in most patients it is not able to demonstrate the site from which the fragments detach, as well as show their overall size and gross appearance. In conclusion, loose bodies are consistently depicted with US. A high degree of suspicion, knowledge of the radiographic studies, as well as a careful scanning technique, however, are essential to obtain a reliable diagnosis of loose bodies. US is able to support plain films to confirm the intra-articular location of a calcification around a joint. During routine joint examination, US can recognize loose bodies as incidental findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10442075     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound of the elbow.

Authors:  K Finlay; M Ferri; L Friedman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Arthroscopic loose-body removal in posterior compartment of the knee joint: a technical note.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Jae Chul Yoo; Sang Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Loose body as an obstacle for posterolateral arthroscopic portal formation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Anshul Dahuja; Jae Hyuk Yang; Jung-Ro Yoon; Shiraz Bhatty
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 4.  Ultrasound and bone: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-17

5.  Clinic and ultrasound findings related to pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Başkan Bedriye Mermerci; Yeşim Garip; Ramadan Selma Uysal; Halil Doğruel; Erdem Karabulut; Kürşat Ozoran; Hatice Bodur
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Sonography of the knee joint().

Authors:  A A K A Razek; N S Fouda; N Elmetwaley; E Elbogdady
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2009-04-28

7.  Validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound for identification of humeroradial joint chondral lesions: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Chelsea M Lohman; Michael P Smith; Gregory S Dedrick; Jean-Michel Brismée
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Arthroscopic treatment of bony loose bodies in the subacromial space.

Authors:  Wei Li; De-Ming Xiao; Chang-Qing Jiang; Wen-Tao Zhang; Ming Lei
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-07

Review 9.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of the glenoid labrum of the glenohumeral joint. Part II: Examples of labral pathologies.

Authors:  Wojciech Krzyżanowski; Marta Tarczyńska
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2012-09-30

10.  Arthroscopic removal of loose bodies using the accessory portals in the difficult locations of the knee: a case series and technical note.

Authors:  Biao Chen; Liaobin Chen; Haitao Chen; Xu Yang; Kai Tie; Hua Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.