Literature DB >> 10441898

The hazards of chrysotile asbestos: a critical review.

P J Landrigan1, W J Nicholson, Y Suzuki, J Ladou.   

Abstract

Chrysotile, or "white", asbestos is the dominant form of asbestos in international commerce today. It accounts for 99% of current world asbestos production of 2 million tonnes. Chrysotile is an extremely hazardous material. Clinical and epidemiologic studies have established incontrovertibly that chrysotile causes cancer of the lung, malignant mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum, cancer of the larynx and certain gastrointestinal cancers. Chrysotile also causes asbestosis, a progressive fibrous disease of the lungs. Risk of these diseases increases with cumulative lifetime exposure to chrysotile and rises also with increasing time interval (latency) since first exposure. Comparative analyses have established that chrysotile is 2 to 4 times less potent than crocidolite asbestos in its ability to cause malignant mesothelioma, but of equal potency of causation of lung cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization has declared chrysotile asbestos a proven human carcinogen. Sales of chrysotile asbestos have virtually ended in Western Europe and North America, because of widespread recognition of its health hazards. However, asbestos sales remain strong in Japan, across Asia and in developing nations worldwide. The claim has been made that chrysotile asbestos can be used "safely" under "certain conditions" in those nations. That claim is not accurate. The Collegium Ramazzini, an international learned society in environmental and occupational medicine, has called for an immediate worldwide ban on all sales and uses of all forms of asbestos, including chrysotile. The rationale for this ban is threefold: (1) that safer substitute materials are readily available, (2) that "controlled" use of asbestos is not possible, and (3) that the health risks of asbestos are not acceptable in either the industrialized or the newly industrializing nations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10441898     DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.37.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Health        ISSN: 0019-8366            Impact factor:   2.179


  6 in total

1.  Asbestos is still with us: repeat call for a universal ban.

Authors:  Collegium Ramazzini
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  The case for a global ban on asbestos.

Authors:  Joseph LaDou; Barry Castleman; Arthur Frank; Michael Gochfeld; Morris Greenberg; James Huff; Tushar Kant Joshi; Philip J Landrigan; Richard Lemen; Jonny Myers; Morando Soffritti; Colin L Soskolne; Ken Takahashi; Daniel Teitelbaum; Benedetto Terracini; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response.

Authors:  Misty J Hein; Leslie T Stayner; Everett Lehman; John M Dement
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Asbestos Exposure among Mitering Workers.

Authors:  Wantanee Phanprasit; Dusit Sujirarat; Pirutchada Musigapong; Penpatra Sripaiboonkij; Chalermchai Chaikittiporn
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2012-08-30

5.  Optimization of bacterial plasmid transformation using nanomaterials based on the Yoshida effect.

Authors:  Haidong Tan; Li Fu; Masaharu Seno
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Health effects of asbestos and nonasbestos fibers.

Authors:  O Y Osinubi; M Gochfeld; H M Kipen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.