Literature DB >> 10441535

Nuclear transfer in farm animal species.

K H Campbell1.   

Abstract

CLONE 'a group of two or more individuals with identical genetic makeup derived, by asexual reproduction, from a single common parent or ancestor' (The Chambers Dictionary 1993, Chambers Harrap). The term clone was originally applied to plants but has subsequently been used in a much broader context to include a person or thing closely similar to another, a copy or replica. In animals, true clones, as defined above, may be produced by embryo splitting or blastomere separation either artificially, or as occurs naturally in the production of identical twins. In these individuals all of the components making up the individual, including nuclear genetic material (the genome) and other maternally derived factors are derived from a single unique embryo which is the result of sexual reproduction. The term clone has been applied to animals produced by the technique of nuclear transfer. In this asexual process, nuclear genetic material is transferred from a donor cell (karyoplast) into a recipient cell (cytoplast) from which the genetic material has been removed. In farm animals the cytoplast of choice is the matured oocyte (or unfertilised egg) thus the animals developing from this technique are not true clones as each cytoplast is often derived from a different animal. The resultant animals may therefore be more aptly described as 'genomic copies'. In mammals, successful development of embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer was originally restricted to using early embryos as nuclear donors, however, recent progress has demonstrated successful development using nuclei from embryonic, foetal and adult derived cell populations. Numerous factors affect the development of embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer including; the cell cycle stage of the recipient cell, the cell cycle stage of the donor nucleus, the differentiated state of the donor nucleus, activation of the recipient cell, the culture method. In addition, there are variations in success between species, these may be related to differences in organisation of the cytoskeleton and/or the meiotic spindle in the recipient cell,differences in cell cycle control during early development, the onset of zygotic transcription or differences in the metabolic requirements of early embryos in vitro. The aim of this article is to describe and discuss some of these factors in relation to the successful development of nuclear transfer reconstructed embryos and in particular to the 'reprogramming' or 'remodeling' of the donor genetic material to attain successful development. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10441535     DOI: 10.1006/scdb.1999.0310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  8 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell plasticity, beyond alchemy.

Authors:  Michael S Rutenberg; Takashi Hamazaki; Amar M Singh; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Dynamic nuclear organization of constitutive heterochromatin during fetal male germ cell development in mice.

Authors:  Hirotaka Yoshioka; John R McCarrey; Yukiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Quantification of leukocyte genomic 5-methylcytosine levels reveals epigenetic plasticity in healthy adult cloned cattle.

Authors:  Béatrice de Montera; Dalia El Zeihery; Sigrid Müller; Hélène Jammes; Gottfried Brem; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Fabian Scheipl; Pascale Chavatte-Palmer; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Oliver J Schmitz; Eckhard Wolf; Jean-Paul Renard; Stefan Hiendleder
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Heterogeneous nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed by bovine oocytes and camel (Camelus bactrianus) skin fibroblasts and their subsequent development.

Authors:  Huanmin Zhou; Zhenhua Guo
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Femtosecond laser oocyte enucleation as a low-invasive and effective method of recipient cytoplast preparation.

Authors:  Alina A Osychenko; Alexandr D Zalessky; Uliana A Tochilo; David Yu Martirosyan; Yulia Yu Silaeva; Victor A Nadtochenko
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Viral transduction of male germline stem cells results in transgene transmission after germ cell transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Wenxian Zeng; Lin Tang; Alla Bondareva; Ali Honaramooz; Valeria Tanco; Camila Dores; Susan Megee; Mark Modelski; Jose Rafael Rodriguez-Sosa; Melissa Paczkowski; Elena Silva; Matt Wheeler; Rebecca L Krisher; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 7.  Nuclear reprogramming in mammalian somatic cell nuclear cloning.

Authors:  H Tamada; N Kikyo
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 8.  Epigenetic reprogramming in the mammalian embryo: struggle of the clones.

Authors:  Mellissa R W Mann; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 13.583

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.