Literature DB >> 10439142

Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.

B C Moore1, J I Alcántara, M A Stone, B R Glasberg.   

Abstract

A model for predicting loudness for people with cochlear hearing loss was applied to the problem of the initial fitting of a multi-channel compression hearing aid. The fitting was based on two constraints: (1) The specific loudness pattern evoked by speech of a moderate level (65 dB SPL) should be reasonably flat (equal loudness per critical band), and the overall loudness should be similar to that evoked in a normal listener by 65-dB speech (about 23 sones for binaural listening); (2) Speech with an overall level of 45 dB SPL should just be audible in all frequency bands from 500 Hz up to about 4 kHz, provided that this does not require compression ratios exceeding about 3. These two constraints were used to determine initial values for the gain, compression ratio and compression threshold in each channel of a multi-channel compression system. This initial fitting was based entirely on audiometric thresholds; it does not require suprathreshold loudness measures. The fitting method was evaluated using an experimental fast-acting four-channel compression system. The initial fitting was followed by an adaptive procedure to 'fine tune' the fitting, and the aids were then used in everyday life. Performance was evaluated by use of questionnaires and by measures of speech intelligibility. Although the fine tuning resulted in modest changes in the fitting parameters for some subjects, on average the frequency response shapes and compression ratios were similar before and after the fine tuning. The fittings led to satisfactory loudness impressions in everyday life and to high speech intelligibility over a wide range of levels. It was concluded that the initial fitting method gives reasonable starting values for the fine tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10439142     DOI: 10.3109/03005369909090095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  7 in total

1.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

2.  Behavioral estimates of the contribution of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction to individualized audiometric loss.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-24

3.  Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ayham Zedan; Tim Jürgens; Ben Williges; Birger Kollmeier; Konstantin Wiebe; Julio Galindo; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ben Williges; Thomas Wesarg; Lorenz Jung; Leontien I Geven; Andreas Radeloff; Tim Jürgens
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Open community platform for hearing aid algorithm research: open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA).

Authors:  Hendrik Kayser; Tobias Herzke; Paul Maanen; Max Zimmermann; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  SoftwareX       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  Modelling speech reception thresholds and their improvements due to spatial noise reduction algorithms in bimodal cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ayham Zedan; Tim Jürgens; Ben Williges; David Hülsmeier; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 7.  Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings.

Authors:  Sabine Haumann; Volker Hohmann; Markus Meis; Tobias Herzke; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-08-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.