A Coates1, A J Rutherford, H Hunter, H J Leese. 1. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Yorkshire, United Kingdom. alcoates@ulth.northy.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether excluding glucose from the culture medium used in a clinical IVF program improves human embryo quality and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical assisted conception laboratory in a large teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred forty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(S): Embryos were cultured from the pronucleate stage to ET in medium with glucose for patients in the control group and without glucose for patients in the trial group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy rates between the two groups. RESULT(S): Embryo quality was enhanced with the use of glucose-free medium but pregnancy rates were similar. CONCLUSION(S): Although pregnancy rates remained similar in the two groups, a reduction in the glucose concentration of the medium used for embryo culture from the pronucleate stage to ET on day 2 or 3 is prudent.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether excluding glucose from the culture medium used in a clinical IVF program improves human embryo quality and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical assisted conception laboratory in a large teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred forty-one patients undergoing IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(S): Embryos were cultured from the pronucleate stage to ET in medium with glucose for patients in the control group and without glucose for patients in the trial group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy rates between the two groups. RESULT(S): Embryo quality was enhanced with the use of glucose-free medium but pregnancy rates were similar. CONCLUSION(S): Although pregnancy rates remained similar in the two groups, a reduction in the glucose concentration of the medium used for embryo culture from the pronucleate stage to ET on day 2 or 3 is prudent.
Authors: Robert E Chapin; Wendie A Robbins; Laura A Schieve; Anne M Sweeney; Sonia A Tabacova; Kay M Tomashek Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.031