Literature DB >> 10438086

Continuous electronic fetal monitoring: contradictions between practice and research.

L A Haggerty1.   

Abstract

The reliability, validity, and efficacy of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) remain matters of controversy. In fact, several professional organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have endorsed the use of intermittent auscultation for low-risk pregnant women. Nevertheless, in 1996, 83% of laboring women in the United States are monitored electronically. Nurses should encourage healthy, low-risk pregnant women to weigh carefully decisions about the use of EFM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10438086     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb02010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  3 in total

1.  Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy.

Authors:  Leo Turcotte; John Robst; Solomon Polachek
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-09

2.  Maternal-newborn nursing: thirteen challenges that influence excellence in practice.

Authors:  K S Montgomery
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2001

3.  The rhetoric of informed choice: perspectives from midwives on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  Carol Hindley; Ann M Thomson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.