Literature DB >> 10437835

An algorithm to reduce the incidence of false-negative FAST examinations in patients at high risk for occult injury. Focused Assessment for the Sonographic Examination of the Trauma patient.

R B Ballard1, G S Rozycki, P G Newman, J E Cubillos, J P Salomone, W L Ingram, D V Feliciano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Focused Assessment for the Sonographic Examination of the Trauma patient (FAST) sequentially surveys for the presence or absence of blood in dependent abdominal regions including the right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, and the pelvis. But it does not readily identify intraparenchymal or retroperitoneal injuries, and a CT scan of the abdomen may be needed to reduce the incidence of missed injuries. We hypothesized that select patients who are considered high risk for occult injuries should undergo a CT scan of the abdomen when the FAST is negative so that occult injuries can be detected. STUDY
DESIGN: An algorithm was prospectively tested for the evaluation of select injured patients over a 3 1/2-year period. Entrance criteria included adult patients with a blunt mechanism of trauma, a negative FAST examination, and a spine fracture (with or without cord injury), or a pelvic fracture. Trauma team members performed the FAST on patients during the Advanced Trauma Life Support secondary survey. Data recorded included the patient's mechanism and type of injury, the results of the FAST and CT scan examinations, operative or postmortem findings or both, and patient outcomes. Patients with spine injuries were grouped according to spine level and the presence or absence of neurologic deficit. The patients with pelvic fractures were grouped according to the Young and Resnick classification.
RESULTS: One hundred two of 1,490 patients (6.8%) who had FAST examinations were entered into this study. Thirty-two patients (30.5%) had spine injuries, with only one false-negative ultrasound result. Seventy patients (68.6%) had pelvic fractures with 13 false-negative ultrasound results: 11 ring (9 from motor vehicle crashes, 2 from pedestrians struck), 1 acetabular, and 1 isolated pelvic fracture. Nine patients underwent nonoperative management for solid organ injuries, and 4 patients needed surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary data, we conclude that patients with pelvic ring-type fractures should have CT scans of the abdomen because of the higher yield for occult injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10437835     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  17 in total

1.  Portable ultrasonography in mass casualty incidents: The CAVEAT examination.

Authors:  Stanislaw Peter Stawicki; James M Howard; John P Pryor; David P Bahner; Melissa L Whitmill; Anthony J Dean
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18

2.  [Value of clinical key symptoms in the primary treatment of severely injured patients].

Authors:  S Piatek; G Pliske; A Ballaschk; K Witzel; F Walcher
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  [The significance of delayed diagnosis of lesions in multiply traumatised patients. A study of 1,187 shock room patients].

Authors:  B Pehle; C A Kuehne; J Block; C Waydhas; G Taeger; D Nast-Kolb; S Ruchholtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The utility of FAST for initial abdominal screening of major pelvic fracture patients.

Authors:  Diederik O F Verbeek; Ijsbrand A J Zijlstra; Christaan van der Leij; Kornelis J Ponsen; Otto M van Delden; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Selman Uranues; Dorin Eugen Popa; Bogdan Diaconescu; Rudolph Schrittwieser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Institutional and individual learning curves for focused abdominal ultrasound for trauma: cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  F D McCarter; F A Luchette; M Molloy; J M Hurst; K Davis; J A Johannigman; S B Frame; J E Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prospective evaluation of non-radiologist performed emergency abdominal ultrasound for haemoperitoneum.

Authors:  A Brooks; B Davies; M Smethhurst; J Connolly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  [Shock trauma room diagnosis: initial diagnosis after blunt abdominal trauma. A review of the literature].

Authors:  T Lindner; H J Bail; S Manegold; U Stöckle; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Laparoscopy in Abdominal Trauma.

Authors:  Selman Uranüs; Katrin Dorr
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.