Literature DB >> 10437613

Immunological consequences of laparoscopic surgery, speculations on the cause and clinical implications.

C Sietses1, R H Beelen, S Meijer, M A Cuesta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune suppression is an established consequence of surgical stress and trauma. Postoperative changes in the systemic immune system are proportional to the degree of surgical trauma and subsequent immune suppression may be implicated in the development of infectious complications and tumor metastasis formation. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the magnitude of the operative trauma and is thought to preserve postoperative immunological defenses.
METHODS: Relevant literature concerning postoperative immune functions and laparoscopic surgery was reviewed and clinical implications are discussed.
RESULTS: The influence of laparoscopic surgery on the postoperative systemic immune response is significantly less after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than with the conventional approach. Few immunological data are available concerning more advanced laparoscopic procedures. Various animal model studies of postoperative septic complications and tumor growth show that the postoperative preservation of the systemic immune response after laparoscopic surgery can have enormous clinical advantages.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery preserves the postoperative immunological defenses. In the future, this may imply a lower number of infections, less local recurrence and even fewer distant metastases. Prospective randomized studies are necessary to see whether these suspected advantages can be demonstrated in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10437613     DOI: 10.1007/s004230050200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  27 in total

Review 1.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Buunen; M Gholghesaei; R Veldkamp; D W Meijer; H J Bonjer; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Changes of inflammatory mediators in obese patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gaetano Di Vita; Rosalia Patti; Fausto Famà; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Giuseppina Candore; Calogero Caruso
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Han; Woo Yong Lee; Chi-Min Park; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Fan Tianyong; Wei Qiang; Cui Xiaobo; Bu Siyuan; Han Ping
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Response to preoperative chemotherapy predicts survival in patients undergoing hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Luca Viganò; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Daniel Seehofer; Martin Dreyer; Andreas Pascher; Marcus Bahra; Wenzel Schoening; Volker Schmitz; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Timm Denecke; Gero Puhl; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Peter Neuhaus; Lorenzo Capussotti; Johann Pratschke; Sven-Christian Schmidt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Minimally invasive video-assisted versus conventional open thyroidectomy on immune response: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Chenhong Zheng; Shouying Liu; Peiliang Geng; Huiming Zhang; Hongpeng Zhang; Airong Tang; Xiaohua Xie
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 7.  [Influence of anesthesia procedure on malignant tumor outcome].

Authors:  K Fukui; C Werner; G Pestel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Pre-treatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 does not predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed Aldakkak; Kathleen K Christians; Ashley N Krepline; Ben George; Paul S Ritch; Beth A Erickson; Fabian M Johnston; Douglas B Evans; Susan Tsai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Surgical stress promotes tumor growth in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Lee; Mian M K Shahzad; Yvonne G Lin; Guillermo Armaiz-Pena; Lingegowda S Mangala; Hee-Dong Han; Hye-Sun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Nicholas B Jennings; Jyotsnabaran Halder; Alpa M Nick; Rebecca L Stone; Chunhua Lu; Susan K Lutgendorf; Steve W Cole; Anna E Lokshin; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.