Literature DB >> 10436851

Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments.

D J Maiman1, S Kumaresan, N Yoganandan, F A Pintar.   

Abstract

The biomechanical effects of superior (C4-C5) and inferior (C5-C6) level fusions with different graft materials on the adjacent unaltered components were quantified using an anatomically accurate and experimentally validated C4-C5-C6 finite element model. Smith-Robinson and Bailey-Badgley fusion procedures were analyzed with five different types of inter-body fusion materials with varying stiffnesses. Intact and surgically altered finite element models were subjected to physiologic compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. The external axial and angular stiffness, and the internal unaltered intervertebral disc (C5-C6 for the superior and C4-C5 for inferior fusion) and C5 vertebral body stresses were determined. The superior level fusion resulted in the highest increase in external response in lateral bending for all implant materials in both surgical procedures. In contrast, the inferior level fusion produced a higher increase in the C4-C5 disc and C5 vertebral body stresses in compression than the superior level fusion in both surgical procedures. The increased internal stress responses reflecting the changes in the load-sharing following inferior level fusion may explain clinical observations such as enhanced degeneration subsequent to surgery. Because of the inclusion of three levels in the present multi-segment finite element model, it was possible to determine these responses in the unaltered adjacent components of the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10436851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  35 in total

1.  Tri-level surgical treatment of cervical spinal cord compression in a Thoroughbred yearling.

Authors:  Nick Huggons
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Subject-specific inverse dynamics of the head and cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Cheng Xu; Bo Yin; Xin-Lei Xia; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Hong-Li Wang; Jun Yin; Ming-Hao Shao; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Adjacent segment degeneration following ProDisc-C total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): does surgeon bias effect radiographic interpretation?

Authors:  Eric B Laxer; Craig D Brigham; Bruce V Darden; P Bradley Segebarth; R Alden Milam; Alfred L Rhyne; Susan M Odum; Leo R Spector
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical study on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Ma Haijun; Zhang Haoping; Zhou Honggang; Zhao Xiaobing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Influence of cervical spine sagittal alignment on range of motion after corpectomy: a finite element study.

Authors:  Jobin D John; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar; Narayan Yoganandan; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Therapeutic options and results following fixed atlantoaxial rotatory dislocations.

Authors:  Markus Weisskopf; Detlef Naeve; Michael Ruf; Jürgen Harms; Dezsö Jeszenszky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.