Literature DB >> 10436809

Role of tumour markers, cytogenetics.

R Lamerz1.   

Abstract

A review is presented on the role of conventional and molecular tumour markers (TM) in diagnosis and monitoring of patients with biliopancreatic malignancies. For biliopancreatic malignancy, following CEA as more historical and basic TM of gastrointestinal diseases, the mainstay marker is CA 19-9 as monosialo-ganglioside/glycolipid and sialyl derivative of lacto-N-fucopentaose II (sialyl-Lewis(a), hapten of human Lewis(a) bloodgroup determinant). It is detected in serum of healthy individuals at low concentration < 40 U/ml, with lower and often transitional elevation in benign hepatobiliary diseases and with highest levels in excretory ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (s = 70%-95%, sp = 72%-90%), biliary (s = 55%-79%), hepatocellular and cholangiocellular cancer (s = 22%-51%) besides gastric, colorectal and ovarian cancer and occasionally in lung, breast and uterine cancer. Physiologically elevated concentrations in healthy individuals have to be considered in all sorts of secretions (e.g. sputum, saliva, bronchial/gastric secretions, bile juice) of individuals with Lewis(a)-positive secretor status in contrast with low or lacking serum levels of CA 19-9 in patients with Lewis(a-/b-) status (7%-10% of population). In biliopancreatic malignancies, especially pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9 correlates well with clinical course of disease following surgical, chemo- or radiotherapy by a quick normalisation within 2-4 weeks after complete surgery, a transient decrease with successful palliative therapy and an often anticipated increase (lead time up to 6 months) before clinical detection in case of relapse or progressive disease. From CA 19-9 related TM tests some are detecting in addition to sialyl-Lewis(a) (sialyllacto-N-fucopentaose II) also the non-fucosylated precursor sialyl-Lewis(c) (sialyllacto-N-tetraose: CA 50, CA 242, Span-1) solely detected by the DUPAN-2 test and independent of the Lewis(a) secretor status. Some other markers comprise in addition to sialyl-Lewis(a) partially the non-sialylated Lewis(a) antigen (CA 195, CAM 43, CA 494) or are less related (CAM 17.1). The initial phase of screening and early detection is hoped to be better assessed by using molecular markers detecting gene mutations (p53, K-ras), growth factors (EGF, TGF-alpha, TGF-beta, HB-EGF, a/bFGFs, KGF) and growth factor receptor alterations (EGFr, c-erbB2/3/4). From these, K-ras mutations detected in blood, stool and bile juice of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer seem to be more promising than p53 alterations as a more later step in carcinogenesis, although they are neither yet well established nor standardised by reliable assays. In contrast growth factor and growth factor receptor alterations mainly concerning signal transducing systems seem to reflect increased tumour aggressiveness, thus shorter survival and poorer prognosis thereby contributing in the selection of patients for more aggressive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10436809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  58 in total

1.  Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Efthimiou; T Crnogorac-Jurcevic; N R Lemoine; T A Brentnall
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  A new cause for CA19.9 elevation: heavy tea consumption.

Authors:  M Howaizi; M Abboura; C Krespine; M-S Sbai-Idrissi; O Marty; M Djabbari-Sobhani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Identifying molecular markers for the early detection of pancreatic neoplasia.

Authors:  Michael Goggins
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Current treatment options for pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Emily Castellanos; Jordan Berlin; Dana Backlund Cardin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  High level of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a poor survival predictor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Ra Choi; Jun Chul Park; Jie-Hyun Kim; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee; Jae Bock Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Correlation of CEA but not CA 19-9 as serum biomarkers of disease activity in a case of metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eric I Marks; Matthew Brennan; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 8.  Biomarkers in bile-complementing advanced endoscopic imaging in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy; Benjamin Tharian; Udayakumar Navaneethan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 9.  Intensity of follow-up after pancreatic cancer resection.

Authors:  Jason A Castellanos; Nipun B Merchant
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  The characteristics of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in gastric cancer cases.

Authors:  Noriko Wada; Yukinori Kurokawa; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.