A V Alexandrov1, A M Demchuk, T H Wein, J C Grotta. 1. Center for Noninvasive Brain Perfusion Studies and the Stroke Treatment Team, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, USA. avalexandrov@worldnet.att.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the yield of emergent transcranial Doppler (TCD) for the evaluation of acute cerebral ischemia. METHODS: We performed urgent bedside non-contrast-enhanced TCD in patients with acute cerebral ischemia before or immediately after baseline CT scanning. A fast-track scanning protocol (</=15 minutes) and detailed diagnostic criteria were developed for portable single-channel TCD testing. TCD results were compared with angiography. RESULTS: Of 130 consecutive patients studied, 36 were eligible for thrombolytic therapy; 46 with ischemic strokes and 48 with transient ischemic attacks were not eligible for thrombolysis. TCD identified occlusions in 69% of thrombolysis-eligible patients, compared with 24% and 0% of patients with strokes and transient ischemic attacks, respectively, not eligible for thrombolysis (P<0.01). Stenosis was present in 17%, 33%, and 35%, and normal vessels were found in 14%, 43%, and 65% in the respective patient subgroups. TCD also identified abnormal pulsatility of flow (12 patients), abnormal flow velocities (12), microembolic signals (5), or early recanalization (5) (34 of 130; 26%). In 65% of all patients, TCD was compared with angiography (digital subtraction angiography, MR angiography, or CT angiography). Despite a 15% rate of absent temporal windows, TCD had 88% accuracy for abnormal (occlusion and stenosis) versus normal vessels: sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 88.6%, positive predictive value 87. 5%, and negative predictive value 88.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A proximal occlusion on TCD was found in 69% of thrombolysis-eligible patients. In 26% of all patients, TCD provided further relevant information that, in addition to angiography, helped to refine the severity of a stenosis and determine stroke pathogenesis. Emergent TCD is both sensitive and specific in determining arterial occlusion and stenosis in acute cerebral ischemia.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the yield of emergent transcranial Doppler (TCD) for the evaluation of acute cerebral ischemia. METHODS: We performed urgent bedside non-contrast-enhanced TCD in patients with acute cerebral ischemia before or immediately after baseline CT scanning. A fast-track scanning protocol (</=15 minutes) and detailed diagnostic criteria were developed for portable single-channel TCD testing. TCD results were compared with angiography. RESULTS: Of 130 consecutive patients studied, 36 were eligible for thrombolytic therapy; 46 with ischemic strokes and 48 with transient ischemic attacks were not eligible for thrombolysis. TCD identified occlusions in 69% of thrombolysis-eligible patients, compared with 24% and 0% of patients with strokes and transient ischemic attacks, respectively, not eligible for thrombolysis (P<0.01). Stenosis was present in 17%, 33%, and 35%, and normal vessels were found in 14%, 43%, and 65% in the respective patient subgroups. TCD also identified abnormal pulsatility of flow (12 patients), abnormal flow velocities (12), microembolic signals (5), or early recanalization (5) (34 of 130; 26%). In 65% of all patients, TCD was compared with angiography (digital subtraction angiography, MR angiography, or CT angiography). Despite a 15% rate of absent temporal windows, TCD had 88% accuracy for abnormal (occlusion and stenosis) versus normal vessels: sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 88.6%, positive predictive value 87. 5%, and negative predictive value 88.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A proximal occlusion on TCD was found in 69% of thrombolysis-eligible patients. In 26% of all patients, TCD provided further relevant information that, in addition to angiography, helped to refine the severity of a stenosis and determine stroke pathogenesis. Emergent TCD is both sensitive and specific in determining arterial occlusion and stenosis in acute cerebral ischemia.
Authors: Andrei V Alexandrov; Robert Mikulik; Marc Ribo; Vijay K Sharma; Annabelle Y Lao; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Rebecca M Sugg; Andrew Barreto; Paul Sierzenski; Marc D Malkoff; James C Grotta Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: O O Zaidat; M A Lazzaro; D S Liebeskind; N Janjua; L Wechsler; R G Nogueira; R C Edgell; J S Kalia; A Badruddin; J English; D Yavagal; J F Kirmani; A V Alexandrov; P Khatri Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ashwin B Parthasarathy; Kimberly P Gannon; Wesley B Baker; Christopher G Favilla; Ramani Balu; Scott E Kasner; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre; Michael T Mullen Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Arunodaya R Gujjar; Ranjan William; P C Jacob; Rajeev Jain; Abdullah R Al-Asmi Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 2.502