Literature DB >> 10435839

Improving population-based cervical cancer screening in general practice: effects of a national strategy.

R P Hermens1, E Hak, M E Hulscher, J Mulder, M A Tacken, J C Braspenning, R P Grol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a Dutch national prevention programme, aimed at general practitioners (GPs), on the adherence to organizational guidelines for effective cervical cancer screening in general practice. To identify the characteristics of general practices determining success.
DESIGN: A prospective questionnaire study with pre- and post-measurement (before and 15 months after the introduction of the national programme). SETTING AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of one-third of all 4758 Dutch general practices. One GP was asked to participate per practice. INTERVENTION: A national GP prevention programme to improve population-based prevention of cervical cancer combining various methods for quality improvement in general practice, performed on a national, district and practice level. Outreach visitors were a key strategy in bringing about behavioural changes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of practices adhering to 10 recommendations (in four guidelines) to organize effective cervical cancer screening.
RESULTS: After 15 months, all Dutch practices showed significant improvement in adherence to nine out of 10 recommendations. Two recommendations, in particular 'identifying women who should be medically excluded from screening' and 'sending a reminder to non-compliers' showed the largest absolute increases of 26% and 33%, respectively. Besides more intensive support of outreach visitors, practice characteristics such as 'computerization' and 'delegation of many clinical tasks to the practice assistant' were important in improving the adherence to guidelines.
CONCLUSION: The national programme, with a combination of various methods for quality improvement, appeared to be effective in improving the organization of cervical screening in general practice. Computerization and, to a lesser extent, delegation of many clinical tasks to the practice assistant and more intensive support to practices, positively influenced the effectiveness of the national programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10435839     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

1.  Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.

Authors:  R P Hermens; E Hak; M E Hulscher; J C Braspenning; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Cytology history preceding cervical cancer diagnosis: a regional analysis of 286 cases.

Authors:  M Gök; L Rozendaal; J Berkhof; O Visser; C J L M Meijer; F J van Kemenade
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.