Literature DB >> 10434416

Population genetics of the yellow fever mosquito in Trinidad: comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.

G Yan1, J Romero-Severson, M Walton, D D Chadee, D W Severson.   

Abstract

Recent development of DNA markers provides powerful tools for population genetic analyses. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers result from a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA fingerprinting technique that can detect multiple restriction fragments in a single polyacrylamide gel, and thus are potentially useful for population genetic studies. Because AFLP markers have to be analysed as dominant loci in order to estimate population genetic diversity and genetic structure parameters, one must assume that dominant (amplified) alleles are identical in state, recessive (unamplified) alleles are identical in state, AFLP fragments segregate according to Mendelian expectations and that the genotypes of an AFLP locus are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The HWE assumption is untestable for natural populations using dominant markers. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers segregate as codominant alleles, and can therefore be used to test the HWE assumption that is critical for analysing AFLP data. This study examined whether the dominant AFLP markers could provide accurate estimates of genetic variability for the Aedes aegypti mosquito populations of Trinidad, West Indies, by comparing genetic structure parameters using AFLP and RFLP markers. For AFLP markers, we tested a total of five primer combinations and scored 137 putative loci. For RFLP, we examined a total of eight mapped markers that provide a broad coverage of mosquito genome. The estimated average heterozygosity with AFLP markers was similar among the populations (0.39), and the observed average heterozygosity with RFLP markers varied from 0.44 to 0.58. The average FST (standardized among-population genetic variance) estimates were 0.033 for AFLP and 0.063 for RFLP markers. The genotypes at several RFLP loci were not in HWE, suggesting that the assumption critical for analysing AFLP data was invalid for some loci of the mosquito populations in Trinidad. Therefore, the results suggest that, compared with dominant molecular markers, codominant DNA markers provide better estimates of population genetic variability, and offer more statistical power for detecting population genetic structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10434416     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00647.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  12 in total

1.  A new and versatile method for the successful conversion of AFLP markers into simple single locus markers.

Authors:  Bart Brugmans; Ron G M van der Hulst; Richard G F Visser; Pim Lindhout; Herman J van Eck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Microsatellite-based parentage analysis of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) using nonlethal DNA sampling.

Authors:  Jacklyn Wong; Yui Yin Chu; Steven T Stoddard; Yoosook Lee; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Estimation of multilocus linkage disequilibria in diploid populations with dominant markers.

Authors:  Yanchun Li; Yang Li; Song Wu; Kun Han; Zhengjia Wang; Wei Hou; Yanru Zeng; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Dynamics of gene introgression in the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Daibin Zhong; Emmanuel A Temu; Tom Guda; Louis Gouagna; David Menge; Aditi Pai; John Githure; John C Beier; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genomic approaches with natural fish populations.

Authors:  M F Oleksiak
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.051

6.  Assessment of geographic and host-associated population variations of the carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae, on pomegranate, fig, pistachio and walnut, using AFLP markers.

Authors:  Fariba Mozaffarian; Mohsen Mardi; Alimorad Sarafrazi; Gadir Nouri Ganbalani
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Establishment of the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique for genotyping of pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus)--a noxious insect pest on oilseed rape (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Nadiya Kazachkova; Jan Fahleson; Johan Meijer
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  The attractiveness fragment--AFLP analysis of local adaptation and sexual selection in a caeliferan grasshopper, Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  Kirsten Klappert; Roger K Butlin; Klaus Reinhold
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-04-04

9.  AFLPs reveal different population genetic structure under contrasting environments in the marine snail Nucella lapillus L.

Authors:  Belén Carro; María Quintela; José Miguel Ruiz; Rodolfo Barreiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Signatures of selection in natural populations adapted to chronic pollution.

Authors:  Larissa M Williams; Marjorie F Oleksiak
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.