Literature DB >> 10432909

The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics.

W H Wiist1, J McFarlane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether incorporation of an abuse assessment protocol into the routine procedures of the prenatal clinics of a large urban public health department led to increased referral for and assessment, identification, and documentation of abuse.
METHODS: Evaluation was conducted at 3 matched prenatal clinics serving a total of 12,000 maternity patients per year. Two clinics used the abuse protocol and 1 did not. An audit was performed at the clinics on a randomly selected sample of 540 maternity patient charts for the 15 months before the protocol was initiated and of 540 records for the 15 months after the protocol was introduced. Ninety-six percent of the patients represented in the sample were Latina.
RESULTS: At the clinics using the protocol, abuse assessment increased from 0 to 88%. Detection of abuse increased from 0.8% to 7%. There were no changes at the comparison clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of an abuse assessment protocol into the routine procedures of public health department prenatal clinics increases the assessment, identification, and documentation of and referral for abuse among pregnant women. An abuse protocol should be a routine part of maternity care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10432909      PMCID: PMC1508678          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  21 in total

1.  Identifying and helping battered pregnant women.

Authors:  B Parker; J McFarlane
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.412

2.  Assessing for abuse: self-report versus nurse interview.

Authors:  J McFarlane; K Christoffel; L Bateman; V Miller; L Bullock
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.462

3.  Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white population.

Authors:  S B Sorenson; C A Telles
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1991

4.  Preventing abuse during pregnancy: an assessment and intervention protocol.

Authors:  J McFarlane; B Parker
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.412

5.  Inquiry about victimization experiences. A survey of patient preferences and physician practices.

Authors:  L S Friedman; J H Samet; M S Roberts; M Hudlin; P Hans
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-06

6.  Sociocultural status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families.

Authors:  G K Kantor; J L Jasinski; E Aldarondo
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1994

7.  Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence.

Authors:  L H Parsons; D Zaccaro; B Wells; T G Stovall
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A study of battered women presenting in an emergency department.

Authors:  S V McLeer; R Anwar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry.

Authors:  L K Hamberger; D G Saunders; M Hovey
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Battering in pregnancy: an assessment of two screening methods.

Authors:  L B Norton; J F Peipert; S Zierler; B Lima; L Hume
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  14 in total

1.  Abuse during pregnancy: a quintessential threat to maternal and child health--so when do we start to act?

Authors:  J C Campbell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Physicians' screening practices for female partner abuse during prenatal visits.

Authors:  L Chamberlain; K A Perham-Hester
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

3.  Violence against women and reproductive health: toward defining a role for reproductive health care services.

Authors:  L Parsons; M M Goodwin; R Petersen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Louise M Howard; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 5.  Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Ramsay; Jo Richardson; Yvonne H Carter; Leslie L Davidson; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

6.  Routine screening for intimate partner violence in an obstetrics and gynecology clinic.

Authors:  Sarah Hudson Scholle; Raquel Buranosky; Barbara H Hanusa; LeeAnn Ranieri; Kate Dowd; Benita Valappil
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A comparison of maternal interview and medical record ascertainment of violence among women who had poor pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Lise E Fried; Ann Aschengrau; Howard Cabral; Hortensia Amaro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-27

8.  Discussions about intimate partner violence during prenatal care in the United States: the role of race/ethnicity and insurance status.

Authors:  Susan Cha; Saba W Masho
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-08

9.  Measuring the impact of the Voices of Survivors program on health care workers' attitudes toward survivors of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Christina Nicolaidis; MaryAnn Curry; Martha Gerrity
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The Veterans Health Administration and military sexual trauma.

Authors:  Rachel Kimerling; Kristian Gima; Mark W Smith; Amy Street; Susan Frayne
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.