Literature DB >> 104328

A putative multipartite model of haloperidol interaction in apomorphine-disturbed behavior of the dog.

A Wauquier, W Melis, C J Niemegeers, P A Janssen.   

Abstract

The interaction between various doses of apomorphine and haloperidol on intracranial self-stimulation in the dog was studied using a pradigm in which reinforcing brain-stimulation was controlled by a discriminative auditory stimulus. Reinforced lever-pressing was decreased by low doses of apomorphine and completely suppressed by stereotypogenic doses. At various doses of apomorphine, low doses of haloperidol either increased response inhibition by enhancing stereotypy, or increased lever pressing by reducing stereotypy while concomitantly increasing the number of nonreinforced responses. Intermediate to relatively high doses of haloperidol antagonized stereotypy and the response inhibition produced by apomorphine. High doses of haloperidol antagonized stereotypy but also suppressed self-stimulation. Thus, haloperidol is not only able to restore performance capability, but also disturbed reinforcing and discriminative stimulus control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 104328     DOI: 10.1007/bf00426630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  9 in total

1.  Apomorphine: chemistry, pharmacology, biochemistry.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; W F Van Bever; J E Leysen
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  Schizophrenia: a theory.

Authors:  E Hartmann
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-08-26       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Intracranial self-stimulation in rats as a function of various stimulus parameters. 3. Influence of apomorphine on medial forebrain bundle stimulation with monopolar electrodes.

Authors:  A Wauquier; C J Niemegeers
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973-05-21

4.  Intracranial self-stimulation in rats as a function of various stimulus parameters. II. Influence of haloperidol, pimozide and pipamperone on medial forebrain bundle stimulation with monopolar electrodes.

Authors:  A Wauquier; C J Niemegeers
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

5.  Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillizers) from animal data? IV. An improved experimental design for measuring the inhibitory effects of neuroleptic drugs on amphetamine-or apomorphine-induced "Cheroing" and "agitation" in rats.

Authors:  P A Janssen; C J Niemegeers; K H Schellekens; F M Lenaerts
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1967-07

6.  The apomorphine antagonism test in dogs. Experimental evidence and critical considerations on specific methodological criteria.

Authors:  C J Niemegeers
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Haloperidol blocks the discriminative stimulus properties of lateral hypothalamic stimulation.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1977-03-07       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Antagonism by haloperidol of the L-DOPA-induced disruption of a successive discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  S Ahlenius; J Engel
Journal:  J Neural Transm       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Domperidone, a novel and safe gastrokinetic anti-nauseant for the treatment of dyspepsia and vomiting.

Authors:  A J Reyntjens; C J Niemegeers; J M Van Nueten; P Laduron; J Heykants; K H Schellekens; R Marsboom; A Jageneau; A Broekaert; P A Janssen
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1978
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.