Literature DB >> 10432273

Comparison of direct and enrichment methods for the selective isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from feces of pigs and poultry.

P Butaye1, L A Devriese, F Haesebrouck.   

Abstract

Isolation results of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) of fecal samples from pigs and broiler and layer chickens obtained with two vancomycin-supplemented enrichment media, kanamycin aesculin azide (KAA) broth and Enterococcosel (ECC) broth, and three isolation media, KAA agar, ECC agar, and Slanetz and Bartley (SL) agar, were compared. Direct isolation on vancomycin-containing agar plates was not efficient in swine and layer chickens, which had only low numbers of VRE. In broilers chickens, the VRE content of the samples was high, and SL as well as ECC were found to perform better than KAA agar. The same three agar media were used as selective plating media after 1 and 2 days incubation of the samples in KAA and ECC enrichment broths. Sensitivities of the 12 different enrichment-plate combinations tested ranged from 0 to 81% in layer chickens and from 5 to 44% in samples from pigs. In the high prevalence type of samples from broilers, sensitivities still varied substantially from 52 to 78%. Incubating vancomycin-containing enrichment broths for 2 days compared with 1 day was favorable for the isolation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, E. gallinarum, and E. casseliflavus but not for E. faecium and E. hirae/E. durans. ECC broth and ECC plates yielded the highest number of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. In layer as well as in broiler chickens, ECC broth incubated for 2 days and plated on ECC agar was the most sensitive method. In pigs, however, KAA broth incubated for 2 days and plated on ECC medium yielded the highest number of VRE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10432273     DOI: 10.1089/mdr.1999.5.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  5 in total

1.  High prevalence of VanA-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in Austrian poultry.

Authors:  Alexandra Eisner; Gebhard Feierl; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Franz Dieber; Harald H Kessler; Egon Marth; Josef Köfer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Differences in antibiotic resistance patterns of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from farm and pet animals.

Authors:  P Butaye; L A Devriese; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococcus species isolated from retail meats.

Authors:  Joshua R Hayes; Linda L English; Peggy J Carter; Terry Proescholdt; Kyung Y Lee; David D Wagner; David G White
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Patrick Butaye; Luc A Devriese; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Multiple-antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus spp. isolated from commercial poultry production environments.

Authors:  Joshua R Hayes; Linda L English; Lewis E Carr; David D Wagner; Sam W Joseph
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.