Literature DB >> 10432148

New technologies in cervical cytology screening: a word of caution.

G F Sawaya1, D A Grimes.   

Abstract

Nearly 5000 women in the United States will die of cervical cancer this year and many of those deaths could be prevented. Most incident cases (60%) are associated with absent or deficient screening. Approximately 25% of screening failures are due to errors in cervical sampling or smear interpretation. New techniques for cytology screening such as liquid-based smears and computerized rescreening of slides are being promoted to physicians and the lay public despite limited scientific evaluation. Improving the validity of screening tests is important, but shifting resources for this purpose might cause net harm if the result is fewer screening opportunities for high-risk women. New screening technologies do not address this utilization gap and might widen it by driving the cost of screening out of the reach of high-risk women. Greater decreases in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality would likely result if the same resources were invested in a comprehensive national screening program that targeted women at highest risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10432148     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00289-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cytology after 2000: where to go?

Authors:  C J Meijer; J M Walboomers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The National Institutes of Health Affordable Cancer Technologies Program: Improving Access to Resource-Appropriate Technologies for Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Paul C Pearlman; Rao Divi; Michael Gwede; Pushpa Tandon; Brian S Sorg; Miguel R Ossandon; Lokesh Agrawal; Vinay Pai; Houston Baker; Tiffani Bailey Lash
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush.

Authors:  Antoinette A T P Brink; Chris J L M Meijer; Maarten A H M Wiegerinck; Thedoor E Nieboer; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Folkert van Kemenade; Nathalie Fransen Daalmeijer; Albertus T Hesselink; Johannes Berkhof; Peter J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  p16/Ki-67 dual staining has a better accuracy than human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in women with abnormal cytology under 30 years old.

Authors:  Laurențiu Pirtea; Cristina Secosan; Madalin Margan; Lavinia Moleriu; Oana Balint; Dorin Grigoras; Ioan Sas; Florin Horhat; Adelina Jianu; Răzvan Ilina
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study.

Authors:  Murat Gök; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Folkert J van Kemenade; Johannes Berkhof; Lawrence Rozendaal; Johan W M Spruyt; Feja Voorhorst; Jeroen A M Beliën; Milena Babovic; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-11

6.  Systems analysis of real-world obstacles to successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries.

Authors:  Eric J Suba; Sean K Murphy; Amber D Donnelly; Lisa M Furia; My Linh D Huynh; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Oncogenic potential of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and its relation with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Rabia Faridi; Amreen Zahra; Khalida Khan; Muhammad Idrees
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Safety and efficacy of the new CryoPop® cryotherapy device for cervical dysplasia in low- and middle-income countries: study protocol for a multicenter open-label non-inferiority clinical trial with historical controls.

Authors:  S Yogeshkumar; Jean Anderson; Enriquito Lu; Edward Kenyi; Margaret Mensa; Katrina Thaler; Ramalingappa Antartani; Kasturi Donimath; Basavaraj Patil; Santosh Chikaraddi; Shailaja Bidri; Aruna Biradar; Muttappa R Gudadinni; Laxmikant Lokare; Gayane Yenokyan; Mrutyunjaya B Bellad; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Richard Derman; Amit Revankar; Hema Patil; Ramadevi Wani; Ranjit Kangle; Ramesh Y Chavan; Mahantesh B Nagmoti; Yogendra M Kabadi; Purushotham Reddy; Sunita Vernekar; Surekha Hipparagi; Vijayalaxmi Patil; Anita Dalal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  The Accuracy of p16/Ki-67 and HPV Test in the Detection of CIN2/3 in Women Diagnosed with ASC-US or LSIL.

Authors:  Júlio C Possati-Resende; José H T G Fregnani; Ligia M Kerr; Edmundo C Mauad; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?

Authors:  Robert P Kauffman; Stephen J Griffin; Jon D Lund; Paul E Tullar
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.