Literature DB >> 10431464

Amplitudes and latencies of single-trial ERP's estimated by a maximum-likelihood method.

P Jaśkowski1, R Verleger.   

Abstract

The common approach in research on event-related electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials is to assume that the trigger-related signal is always the same and can be extracted from EEG background activity by simple averaging. To check the validity of this approach and to provide more exact results, latencies and amplitudes of components have to be estimated in single trials. Pham et al. applied a maximum-likelihood approach to solve the more general model which assumes that the signal hidden in EEG background activity has the same shape and amplitude but may vary in its latency from trial to trial. Extending their method we present a solution in which amplitude variability is also allowed. The utility of the solution to estimate the P3 component in single trials was investigated both by extensive pseudoreal simulations and in an application to real data. The simulations showed some advantage of the method over two other methods (Woody's method and peak-picking) commonly used in event-related potentials research. Application to real data provided a plausible description of single-trial sequential effects on the amplitude of the P3 component.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10431464     DOI: 10.1109/10.775409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  17 in total

1.  A novel single-trial event-related potential estimation method based on compressed sensing.

Authors:  Zhihua Huang; Minghong Li; Shangchuan Yang; Yuanye Ma; Changle Zhou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Yonghong Chen; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Taking into account latency, amplitude, and morphology: improved estimation of single-trial ERPs by wavelet filtering and multiple linear regression.

Authors:  L Hu; M Liang; A Mouraux; R G Wise; Y Hu; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Development of a method to compensate for signal quality variations in repeated auditory event-related potential recordings.

Authors:  Antti K O Paukkunen; Miika M Leminen; Raimo Sepponen
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-03-16

5.  A spatiotemporal framework for estimating trial-to-trial amplitude variation in event-related MEG/EEG.

Authors:  Tulaya Limpiti; Barry D Van Veen; Hagai T Attias; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  A spatiotemporal framework for MEG/EEG evoked response amplitude and latency variability estimation.

Authors:  Tulaya Limpiti; Barry D Van Veen; Ronald T Wakai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A spatiotemporal filtering methodology for single-trial ERP component estimation.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Jose C Principe; Margaret Bradley; Vera Ferrari
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Increased intra-participant variability in children with autistic spectrum disorders: evidence from single-trial analysis of evoked EEG.

Authors:  Elizabeth Milne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-30

9.  A fast and reliable method for simultaneous waveform, amplitude and latency estimation of single-trial EEG/MEG data.

Authors:  Wouter D Weeda; Raoul P P P Grasman; Lourens J Waldorp; Maria C van de Laar; Maurits W van der Molen; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  P300 Detection Based on EEG Shape Features.

Authors:  Montserrat Alvarado-González; Edgar Garduño; Ernesto Bribiesca; Oscar Yáñez-Suárez; Verónica Medina-Bañuelos
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.