B J Smith1, M D McNeely. 1. Acquired Intelligence Inc., No. 205-1095 McKenzie Ave., Victoria BC V8P 2L5, Canada. bsmith@aiinc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Laboratory Advisory System (LAS) is an expert system interface that works interactively with clinicians to assist them with test selection and result interpretation throughout the laboratory investigation of a patient. METHODS: To study the influence of the LAS on laboratory investigations, a repeated-measures experiment using clinical vignettes was conducted. To collect baseline data on how laboratory investigations are currently conducted, clinicians investigated one-half of the vignettes using a conventional (noncomputer) approach. To determine the influence of the LAS on clinicians' behavior, the other half of the vignettes were investigated using the LAS. RESULTS: Clinicians using the LAS (compared with conventional practice) ordered fewer laboratory tests during the diagnostic process (mean, 17.8 vs 32.7), completed the diagnostic workup with fewer sample collections (mean, 5.8 vs 7.5), generated lower laboratory costs (mean, $194 vs $232), shortened the time required to reach a diagnosis (mean, 1 day vs 3.2 days), showed closer adherence to established clinical practice guidelines, and exhibited a more uniform and diagnostically successful investigation. CONCLUSION: The LAS enhances the outcome of the investigation and improves laboratory utilization.
BACKGROUND: The Laboratory Advisory System (LAS) is an expert system interface that works interactively with clinicians to assist them with test selection and result interpretation throughout the laboratory investigation of a patient. METHODS: To study the influence of the LAS on laboratory investigations, a repeated-measures experiment using clinical vignettes was conducted. To collect baseline data on how laboratory investigations are currently conducted, clinicians investigated one-half of the vignettes using a conventional (noncomputer) approach. To determine the influence of the LAS on clinicians' behavior, the other half of the vignettes were investigated using the LAS. RESULTS: Clinicians using the LAS (compared with conventional practice) ordered fewer laboratory tests during the diagnostic process (mean, 17.8 vs 32.7), completed the diagnostic workup with fewer sample collections (mean, 5.8 vs 7.5), generated lower laboratory costs (mean, $194 vs $232), shortened the time required to reach a diagnosis (mean, 1 day vs 3.2 days), showed closer adherence to established clinical practice guidelines, and exhibited a more uniform and diagnostically successful investigation. CONCLUSION: The LAS enhances the outcome of the investigation and improves laboratory utilization.
Authors: Jing Du; Young-Taek Park; Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt; Jeffrey S McCullough; Stuart M Speedie Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Paul H H Houben; Ron A G Winkens; Trudy van der Weijden; Renee C R M Vossen; André J M Naus; Richard P T M Grol Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Kathrin M Cresswell; David W Bates; Robin Williams; Zoe Morrison; Ann Slee; Jamie Coleman; Ann Robertson; Aziz Sheikh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 4.497