Literature DB >> 10430111

Developmental pharmacodynamics of cyclosporine.

J D Marshall1, G L Kearns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between human development and in vitro cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) pharmacodynamics.
METHODS: Fifty-six subjects ranging in age from 3 months to 39 years were studied in this prospective laboratory investigation at a university children's hospital and clinical pharmacology laboratory. Peripheral blood monocytes were separated from whole blood and cultured with phytohemagglutinin A (5 microg/mL) and cyclosporine (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000 ng/mL). Peripheral blood monocytes cultures were assayed for cell proliferation and supernatant interleukin-2 concentration with use of radionuclide DNA tagging and enzyme-linked immosorbent assay, respectively. After concentration-effect modeling, summary pharmacodynamic parameters, including the maximal drug effect (Emax) and cyclosporine concentration at which 50% of maximal effect (IC50) and 90% of maximal effect (IC90), were determined. These parameters were compared between four consecutive subject age groups: infants (0-1 years), children (>1-4 years), preadolescents (>4-12 years), and adults (>12 years).
RESULTS: The peripheral blood monocytes of the infants showed a twofold lower mean IC50 (peripheral blood monocyte proliferation) and sevenfold lower mean IC90 (interleukin-2 expression) than peripheral blood monocytes from older subjects. The three older age groups were similar with respect to mean IC50 and Emax (peripheral blood monocyte proliferation). Lymphocyte subtype proportions measured in peripheral blood monocytes preparations from each age group were generally similar. The experimental conditions (eg, general anesthesia and cyclosporine solvents) did not affect peripheral blood monocytes proliferation, but the highest experimental cyclosporine concentration (ie, 5000 ng/mL) was associated with decreased peripheral blood monocytes viability.
CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine pharmacodynamics in vitro are related to age. This factor, if neglected, may be a source of iatrogenic risk during pediatric immunosuppressive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430111     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70055-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

1.  Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in paediatrics: age-related regulation and response to mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  A Rother; P Glander; E Vitt; D Czock; N von Ahsen; V W Armstrong; M Oellerich; K Budde; R Feneberg; B Tönshoff; L T Weber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Population clinical pharmacology of children: modelling covariate effects.

Authors:  Brian J Anderson; Karel Allegaert; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Characterizing the impact of development on the dose-exposure-response relationship: challenge or opportunity?

Authors:  Mary Jayne Kennedy
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in inflammation.

Authors:  Hoi-Kei Lon; Dongyang Liu; William J Jusko
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Understanding developmental pharmacodynamics: importance for drug development and clinical practice.

Authors:  Hussain Mulla
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Pharmacogenomics--how close/far are we to practising individualized medicine for children?

Authors:  Chor-Wing Sing; Ching-Lung Cheung; Ian C K Wong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Influence of dosing schedule on organ exposure to cyclosporin in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: analysis with a PBPK model.

Authors:  Cécile Gérard; Nathalie Bleyzac; Pascal Girard; Gilles Freyer; Yves Bertrand; Michel Tod
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Pediatric Clinical Endpoint and Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers: Limitations and Opportunities.

Authors:  Jean C Dinh; Chelsea M Hosey-Cojocari; Bridgette L Jones
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Developmental pharmacokinetics in pediatric populations.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Strategic biomarkers for drug development in treating rare diseases and diseases in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Jane P F Bai; Jeffrey S Barrett; Gibert J Burckart; Bernd Meibohm; Hari Cheryl Sachs; Lynne Yao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.