Literature DB >> 10430104

In vitro metabolic interaction studies: experience of the Food and Drug Administration.

R Yuan1, T Parmelee, J D Balian, R S Uppoor, F Ajayi, A Burnett, L J Lesko, P Marroum.   

Abstract

A total of 194 new molecular entities approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1992 and 1997 were surveyed to determine the role of in vitro metabolic interactions in the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies and to examine the methods used in these studies. Approximately 30% of the submissions were found to have in vitro metabolism-based interaction studies, most of which were inhibitory in nature. Chemical inhibition was the most commonly used approach in studying drug interactions in vitro. In this article, an attempt to assess the quality of the chemical inhibition approach was made. Four areas were found to be often overlooked: (1) incubation time and concentrations of the drug, (2) the difference between inhibition constant (k(i)) and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, (3) the substrate-dependent inhibition potential, and (4) the metabolic genotype or phenotype of the liver donor. We discuss the pitfalls in estimating drug interactions when these four areas are overlooked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430104     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70048-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  6 in total

Review 1.  The product label: how pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics reach the prescriber.

Authors:  Patrick J Marroum; Jogarao Gobburu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  What will be the role of pharmacogenetics in evaluating drug safety and minimising adverse effects?

Authors:  V Ozdemir; N H Shear; W Kalow
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions from in vitro data : factors affecting prototypic drug-drug interactions involving CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4.

Authors:  Hayley S Brown; Aleksandra Galetin; David Hallifax; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Biotransformation of post-clozapine antipsychotics: pharmacological implications.

Authors:  S Caccia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Quantitative prediction of in vivo inhibitory interactions involving glucuronidated drugs from in vitro data: the effect of fluconazole on zidovudine glucuronidation.

Authors:  Verawan Uchaipichat; Leanne K Winner; Peter I Mackenzie; David J Elliot; J Andrew Williams; John O Miners
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Clinical-pharmacological strategies to assess drug interaction potential during drug development.

Authors:  J Kuhlmann; W Mück
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.228

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.