Literature DB >> 10429840

Coadministration of orally inhaled zanamivir with inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine does not adversely affect the production of antihaemagglutinin antibodies in the serum of healthy volunteers.

A Webster1, M Boyce, S Edmundson, I Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Zanamivir, a clinically proven potent and specific inhibitor of influenza A and B neuraminidase, has been approved in some countries for the treatment of influenza and is in late-stage development for the prophylaxis of influenza. This study investigated whether the coadministration of zanamivir and influenza vaccine affected the development of antibody responses to injected influenza haemagglutinin.
DESIGN: This double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study compared the antihaemagglutinin antibody production [haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titre] after administration of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy volunteers receiving zanamivir or placebo once daily for 28 days. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: 138 healthy volunteers (52 men and 86 nonpregnant women, mean age 32.7 years) were randomised to the zanamivir (70 participants) or placebo (68 participants) groups.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants received a single intramuscular dose (deltoid muscle) of the 1997/1998 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (surface antigen) PhEur (Fluvirin) on day 1, and were then randomised to receive zanamivir 10 mg/day by oral inhalation or placebo for 28 days. Serum samples for determination of HAI titres were obtained before vaccination and on days 15 and 29. Compliance, adverse events and laboratory parameters were monitored.
RESULTS: The primary measure of response was the geometric mean increase in HAI titre against the 3 viral antigens contained in the vaccine, calculated as the ratio of the value 4 weeks after vaccination to the baseline value. The means (and 2-sided 95% confidence intervals) for the ratio between the geometric mean increase with placebo and the increase with zanamivir were as follows: 1.1 (0.7, 1.5) for influenza B, 0.7 (0.4, 1.2) for influenza A H1N1, and 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) for influenza AH3N2. (This corresponds to a test level of alpha = 0.025 for the hypothesis that the increase with placebo was > or = 2-fold greater than the increase with zanamivir.) A lack of effect was concluded as values of 2.0 or greater (i.e. a 2-fold difference) were excluded. Comparisons were also made of the increase in titre at 2 weeks, the proportions of participants with at least a 4-fold increase in titre and the proportions of participants with a titre of at least 1:40. These comparisons revealed no differences between zanamivir- and placebo-treated groups. The nature and incidence of adverse events observed with zanamivir were similar to those observed with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, zanamivir was not associated with a reduced response in HAI titre against the 3 vaccine antigens when compared with placebo. In addition, zanamivir was well tolerated. Inhaled zanamivir 10 mg once daily has been demonstrated to prevent symptomatic laboratory-confirmed influenza in a community outbreak. Zanamivir should have the potential to provide protection during the 2- to 4-week period before full immunity is induced, following vaccination at a time when influenza is circulating in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10429840     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199936001-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prophylaxis and treatment of influenza.

Authors:  R G Douglas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Resistance of influenza A virus to amantadine and rimantadine: results of one decade of surveillance.

Authors:  R B Belshe; B Burk; F Newman; R L Cerruti; I S Sim
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Efficacy and safety of the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir in the treatment of influenzavirus infections. GG167 Influenza Study Group.

Authors:  F G Hayden; A D Osterhaus; J J Treanor; D M Fleming; F Y Aoki; K G Nicholson; A M Bohnen; H M Hirst; O Keene; K Wightman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1998-05-01

Review 5.  Determinants of immunity to influenza infection in man.

Authors:  C W Potter; J S Oxford
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication.

Authors:  M von Itzstein; W Y Wu; G B Kok; M S Pegg; J C Dyason; B Jin; T Van Phan; M L Smythe; H F White; S W Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Summary of clinical trials of inactivated influenza vaccine - 1978.

Authors:  J R La Montagne; G R Noble; G V Quinnan; G T Curlin; W C Blackwelder; J I Smith; F A Ennis; F M Bozeman
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Antivirals for pandemic influenza.

Authors:  F G Hayden
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.

Authors:  B Jones; P Jarvis; J A Lewis; A F Ebbutt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

10.  Ether treatment of type B influenza virus antigen for the hemagglutination inhibition test.

Authors:  A S Monto; H F Maassab
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Zanamivir: an update of its use in influenza.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Zanamivir: a review of its use in influenza.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Zanamivir: a review of clinical safety in individuals at high risk of developing influenza-related complications.

Authors:  S Gravenstein; S L Johnston; E Loeschel; A Webster
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Zanamivir: a review of clinical safety.

Authors:  B Freund; S Gravenstein; M Elliott; I Miller
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  The use of antiviral drugs for influenza: Guidance for practitioners 2012/2013.

Authors:  Fred Y Aoki; Upton D Allen; H Grant Stiver; Gerald A Evans
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  The Role of Neuraminidase Inhibitors in the Treatment and Prevention of Influenza.

Authors:  Naem Shahrour
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Management of influenza virus infections with neuraminidase inhibitors: detection, incidence, and implications of drug resistance.

Authors:  Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin
Journal:  Treat Respir Med       Date:  2005

8.  Threat of an influenza pandemic: family physicians in the front line.

Authors:  Wim Opstelten; Jim E van Steenbergen; Gerrit A van Essen; Marianne A B van der Sande
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Barbara Michiels; Karolien Van Puyenbroeck; Veronique Verhoeven; Etienne Vermeire; Samuel Coenen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.