Literature DB >> 10429733

Anesthetic gas exposure in veterinary clinics.

R E Korczynski1.   

Abstract

Concerns were raised by several workers from veterinary clinics in Manitoba, Canada, regarding potential exposure to isoflurane and halothane during anesthetic administration. There has been no guideline established for isoflurane by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) or a Permissible Exposure Limit by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or a recommended exposure limit (REL) by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The ACGIH TLV-TWA for halothane is 50 ppm and NIOSH has established 2 ppm as a recommended level based on an one-hour sampling. OSHA has established no guideline for halothane. The Miran IB Portable Ambient Air Analyzer was used to conduct real-time sampling and to identify leaks during administration. All veterinary clinics inspected had installed the passive waste gas scavenging system. Ten clinics were each monitored during anesthetic gas delivery for one surgical procedure performed. Induction was 4 to 5 percent and maintenance 1.5 to 2.5 percent. Nine clinics were small animal practices and the tenth was an equine clinic. Veterinarians' personal exposures were higher than the assistants'. Veterinarians' personal exposures for isoflurane ranged from 1.3 to 13 ppm (AM = 5.3; SD +/- 2.7; GM = 4.6; GSD +/- 1.6) and for their assistants, personal exposures ranged from 1.2 to 9 ppm (AM = 4.7; SD +/- 2.5; GM = 3.9; GSD +/- 1.6). Veterinarians' personal exposures for halothane ranged from 0.7 to 12 ppm (AM = 4.2; SD +/- 3.6; GM = 2.9; GSD +/- 1.4) and for their assistants, personal exposures ranged from 0.4 to 3.2 ppm (AM = 1.8; SD +/- 1.0; GM = 1.5; GSD +/- 1.7). One clinic had significant leaks in the anesthetic gas delivery lines. Personal halothane exposure for the veterinarian at this clinic was 7.2 to 65 ppm (AM = 18.0; SD +/- 11.5; GM = 15.9; GSD +/- 1.8). Based on this study, worker exposures were acceptable. Peak exposures were recorded when the cuffed endotracheal tube was removed from the animal. Equipment leaks were minimal when the system was maintained at its optimum operating condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10429733     DOI: 10.1080/104732299302783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1047-322X


  6 in total

1.  Field application of SPME as a novel tool for occupational exposure assessment with inhalational anesthetics.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; AbdulRahman Bahrami; Alireza Ghiasvand; Hossein Mahjub; Ludovic Tuduri
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Trends in exposure of veterinarians to physical and chemical hazards and use of protection practices.

Authors:  Lin Fritschi; Adeleh Shirangi; Ian D Robertson; Lesley M Day
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Waste anesthetic gas exposure and strategies for solution.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Deng; Feng-Xian Li; Ye-Hua Cai; Shi-Yuan Xu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Review of hazards to female reproductive health in veterinary practice.

Authors:  Joni M Scheftel; Brigid L Elchos; Carol S Rubin; John A Decker
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 5.  Cancer in veterinarians.

Authors:  L Fritschi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Measurement of anesthetic pollution in veterinary operating rooms for small animals: Isoflurane pollution in a university veterinary hospital.

Authors:  Drielle B S Figueiredo; Aline G Aun; Juliana R Lara; Natache A Garofalo; Francisco José Teixeira-Neto; Leandro G Braz; Mariana G Braz
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.